Multiplex STR Kits, Inhibitor Handling and Low-Template DNA
The kits behind every modern STR profile: Identifiler Plus, PowerPlex Fusion, GlobalFiler, Investigator 24plex, ESSplex SE QS; the inhibitor classes (haematin, humic acid, indigo, tannic acid) that crash PCR; and the low-template workflows (LCN, increased cycle number, post-PCR clean-up) that pull a profile from picograms.
Last updated:
In a modern forensic DNA laboratory, the connection between a swab collected at a crime scene and a numbered allele profile submitted to a national database runs through a multiplex PCR kit. That kit has been validated by its manufacturer against hundreds of DNA samples spanning the full range of concentration and quality the forensic world produces, then re-validated by the purchasing laboratory against its own instruments, analysts, and sample types before it is trusted with a casework sample. The kit is not a commodity reagent. Each primer pair was designed to bracket a specific short tandem repeat locus, each fluorescent dye channel was allocated to avoid peak overlap, and the entire multiplex was tested to confirm that each locus amplifies consistently in the presence of the others.
Key takeaways
- As of January 2017, CODIS requires 20 core loci for NDIS upload; Identifiler Plus (15 STR loci) is no longer sufficient for new CODIS submissions, while GlobalFiler and PowerPlex Fusion 6C cover both CODIS 20 and ESS17.
- Haematin inhibits Taq polymerase by chelating Mg2+ ions and binding the active site; as little as 20 uM in a 25 uL reaction produces significant inhibition; indigo from denim produces size-dependent drop-out that mimics template degradation.
- Partial inhibition is more dangerous than complete inhibition: smaller loci amplify while larger ones drop out, producing a misleading partial profile that can be misread as degraded DNA without IPC diagnosis.
- Low-copy-number (LCN) PCR increases cycle number to 34 (from the standard 28-29) to generate profiles below 100 pg; stochastic effects (drop-out, drop-in, elevated stutter) are expected and require probabilistic genotyping for correct interpretation.
- R v. Hoey (2007) excluded LCN evidence not because the chemistry was unsound, but because contamination controls and interpretation documentation were inadequate; the Caddy Report (2008) confirmed LCN validity under enhanced quality standards.
Five kits dominate the operational landscape across the world's major forensic DNA jurisdictions: Identifiler Plus (Applied Biosystems, 15 STR loci plus Amelogenin), PowerPlex Fusion 6C (Promega, 23 STR loci plus Amelogenin), GlobalFiler (Applied Biosystems, 24 STR loci plus Amelogenin), Investigator 24plex QS (Qiagen, 24 STR loci plus Amelogenin and a Y-locus), and ESSplex SE QS (Qiagen, 17 STR loci). The move from 13- and 15-locus panels to 24- and 25-locus panels was driven by database search requirements: when the FBI expanded CODIS from 13 to 20 core loci in January 2017, it simultaneously raised the minimum number of loci required for CODIS upload from 13 to 20, the locus-by-locus detail is in CODIS 20, ESS17 and India NDIS locus standards. US, UK, Australian, Canadian, and EU laboratories all upgraded their kits to accommodate expanded locus sets.
A second problem is as old as forensic PCR itself: inhibitors. Substances co-extracted with forensic DNA can bind to the polymerase, chelate the magnesium ions that polymerase activity depends on, or intercalate into the template and physically obstruct the polymerase. A complete inhibition event gives the analyst a clean extraction result, a quantitation reading, and then no profile at all. Partial inhibition is more dangerous because it produces a result, but a degraded one: smaller loci amplify and larger loci drop out, mimicking degradation, generating a misleading partial profile that an inexperienced analyst might misinterpret as a genuine contributor.
The Commercial Kit Landscape: Locus Counts, Dye Channels and Database Compatibility
A kit's locus count is not a marketing claim, it is the number of independent discriminating markers a laboratory can report to a national database.
The 13 original CODIS loci established by the FBI in 1998 formed the first global standard, and kits designed around them (AmpFlSTR Profiler Plus, AmpFlSTR COfiler, PowerPlex 1.1 and 2.1) dominated the 2000s. As national databases accumulated hundreds of thousands of profiles, the random match probability of a 13-locus profile became insufficient to resolve adventitious matches reliably. In the UK, where the National DNA Database held over 6 million profiles by 2016, the probability of a 10-locus coincidental match for a partial profile was no longer negligible, driving adoption of expanded panels. The EU's Prüm framework (Council Decision 2008/615/JHA) mandated that profiles uploaded for cross-border comparison must include the European Standard Set (ESS), which expanded from 7 loci in 1999 to 12 in 2009 and to 17 in 2017.
Identifiler Plus (Applied Biosystems) covers the original CODIS 13 plus 2 additional loci (D2S1338 and D19S433), Amelogenin for sex typing, and a Y-chromosome indel marker. It uses 4 dye channels (6-FAM, VIC, NED, PET) and was the workhorse kit for US, Australian (AFP, state police labs), and South Asian (India CFSL, Pakistan FSL) laboratories through the 2010s. With the 2017 CODIS expansion requiring 20 loci for uploads, Identifiler Plus became insufficient for database submissions in the US, though it remains in use for casework reporting and reference comparisons in laboratories that have not yet transitioned.
PowerPlex Fusion 6C (Promega) targets 23 autosomal STR loci, 1 Y-STR (DYS391), and Amelogenin across 6 dye channels. It covers all 20 CODIS core loci and all 17 ESS loci, making a single amplification compatible with both US NDIS upload requirements and EU Prüm exchange requirements. PowerPlex Fusion is the primary kit used at Promega-aligned laboratories in the United States, Germany (several LKA Bundeskriminalamt-affiliated state labs), Australia (Queensland, South Australia, Western Australia Police), and New Zealand Police (ESR, Environmental Science and Research).
GlobalFiler (Applied Biosystems) covers 24 STR loci plus Amelogenin, with a 6-dye configuration including a 5th colour channel for quality sensor components. It covers CODIS 20 and ESS17. GlobalFiler replaced Identifiler Plus as Applied Biosystems' recommended flagship kit for CODIS-compliant databases and is now the standard kit at numerous US public crime laboratories and at UK commercial forensic providers (Eurofins Forensic Services, Cellmark Forensic Services). India's CFSL has evaluated GlobalFiler as part of its NABL reaccreditation and transition to CODIS-20-compatible profiling.
Investigator 24plex QS (Qiagen) and its companion kit Investigator 24plex GO! (identical locus set, optimised for challenging samples) cover 24 STR loci plus Amelogenin and DYS391. The QS ("Quality Sensor") formulation includes IPC (Internal PCR Control) spike-in for inhibition detection. The GO! variant uses a modified buffer and cycle number configuration for degraded or inhibited samples. Qiagen kits are widely used in German state forensic laboratories (LKA Bayern, LKA Baden-Württemberg), Austrian BKA, Swiss forensic institutes, and several Indian state FSLs.
ESSplex SE QS (Qiagen) covers the European Standard Set of 17 loci, Amelogenin, and DYS391. It is optimised for EU Prüm database upload workflows and is the standard kit at several smaller European national forensic laboratories (Finland, Czech Republic, Slovak Republic) that upload profiles to the Prüm network but do not require CODIS compatibility.
PCR Inhibitors: Classes, Sources and Mechanisms
Inhibition does not always stop PCR from producing a result, partial inhibition silently degrades the result, which is more dangerous than no result at all.
A PCR inhibitor is any substance that reduces the efficiency of the amplification reaction below the threshold where all loci amplify at expected peak heights. Inhibitors reach forensic extracts because they are co-purified with DNA from the original evidence matrix. Four inhibitor classes are of operational significance.
Haematin is the most common and most studied. It is released from haemoglobin by alkaline hydrolysis or prolonged enzymatic degradation and appears in blood stains, blood-saturated soil, and decomposed biological material. Haematin's mechanism is dual: it chelates the Mg2+ ions that Taq polymerase requires for catalytic activity, and it directly inhibits Taq by binding to the enzyme active site. As little as 20 µM haematin in a 25 µL PCR reaction produces significant inhibition. Haematin inhibition is the mechanism that makes blood-stained soil a particularly challenging extraction substrate, a situation encountered in mass grave investigations (such as the 2004 tsunami recovery operations in Thailand and Indonesia, and the post-conflict exhumations at ICMP operations in Bosnia), the extraction chemistry for these challenging substrates is covered in DNA extraction methods, buried homicide victims (as studied in ENFSI working group reports on challenging samples), and crime scenes where decomposition has been prolonged.
Humic acid and fulvic acids are degradation products of plant organic matter, present in soil, peat, and surface runoff. They are co-extracted with DNA from soil swabs and environmental samples. Humic acids inhibit Taq by intercalating into double-stranded DNA (blocking polymerase progression) and by interacting with the negatively charged backbone of nucleic acids in ways that disrupt primer annealing. The concentration at which humic acids produce detectable inhibition in standard PCR is approximately 1 µg/mL.
Indigo is released from denim fabric into body fluid stains deposited on jeans or indigo-dyed fabrics. The criminal forensic significance is obvious: sexual assault and violent crime evidence frequently involves denim. Indigo operates by intercalating into double-stranded template and primer-template duplexes, producing preferential drop-out of larger STR amplicons. The 2002 study by Benecke and Schmitt in the International Journal of Legal Medicine established indigo as a significant inhibitor in German casework.
Tannic acids, present in leather goods, plant material, and heavily tanned textiles, inhibit Taq by a protein-binding mechanism at concentrations as low as 0.05 µg/mL. They are relevant in cases involving leather gloves, belts, or vehicle interiors with leather upholstery.
Detecting and Removing Inhibitors
Knowing an inhibitor is present does not tell you what it is or how to remove it, the diagnosis determines the remedy.
The Internal PCR Control (IPC) spike is the primary inhibition-detection tool in modern forensic kits. Investigator 24plex QS, InnoQuant HY (in the quantitation step), and several other kits include a non-human, non-forensic DNA sequence that is spiked into the reaction at a fixed concentration. If the IPC amplification Ct shifts upward relative to the expected value, inhibition is present and its severity can be estimated. A shift of 2 to 3 Ct cycles indicates moderate inhibition; a shift of more than 5 cycles indicates severe inhibition requiring remediation before any result from the plate can be trusted.
Dilution is the simplest remediation. If an extract is sufficiently concentrated, diluting 1:2 to 1:10 reduces the inhibitor concentration below the threshold for inhibition while maintaining an amplifiable amount of template DNA. The Quantifiler Trio result guides this decision: a sample quantified at 2 ng/µL with an inhibition flag can be diluted to 0.5 ng/µL (reducing both template and inhibitor by 4-fold) and re-amplified. Dilution is ineffective when the extract is already at a low concentration.
Centrifugal ultrafiltration through devices such as the Amicon Ultra (Merck Millipore) or the MinElute PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen) physically retains high-molecular-weight DNA on the membrane while allowing smaller inhibitor molecules to pass through in the filtrate. This works for low-molecular-weight inhibitors (indigo, some inorganic salts) but not for inhibitors of similar or higher molecular weight than DNA (proteins, humic acids can partially co-elute).
Chelex 100 chelation, an ion-exchange resin, binds divalent cations including the iron released from haematin, reducing haematin's Mg2+-chelating mechanism. Chelex extraction is therefore specifically useful for blood-stained soils and decomposed biological matrices where haematin is the dominant inhibitor.
BSA (bovine serum albumin) is a protein additive used in some PCR protocols at 0.1 to 0.8 mg/mL. BSA binds to polyphenolic inhibitors (humic acids, tannic acids) and to haematin, sequestering them and preventing their interaction with Taq. Several UK and German SOPs for challenging samples include BSA as a direct supplement to the amplification reaction.
The Chelex DNA IQ System (Promega) and the PrepFiler BTA Forensic DNA Extraction Kit (Applied Biosystems) incorporate inhibitor-removal chemistry into the extraction step itself, reducing post-extraction inhibitor carry-over. These extraction platforms are specified for challenging sample types in the validated SOPs of several US state crime laboratories and Australian state forensic laboratories.
Low-Template DNA: Stochastic Effects and the LCN Debate
R v. Hoey (2007) in the UK made low-copy-number DNA globally controversial, but the controversy was about interpretation, not chemistry.
Low-template DNA (LT-DNA) amplification refers to any workflow where the input template is below approximately 100 to 200 pg per reaction, the range at which stochastic sampling effects become significant. With so few template molecules, random variation in whether a particular allele molecule is captured in a given reaction aliquot means the two alleles of a heterozygous genotype may amplify to very different peak heights (heterozygote imbalance), or one allele may fail to amplify entirely (allelic drop-out), or a contaminant DNA molecule may amplify to a detectable level (allelic drop-in).
Low-copy-number (LCN) PCR, as developed at the UK Forensic Science Service in the late 1990s and described by Gill, Whitaker, Sparkes, and colleagues in 1997 in Electrophoresis, increases the cycle number from 28 to 34 cycles. This 6-cycle increase raises theoretical amplification from ~268 million to ~17 billion copies, generating profiles from template masses where standard PCR would fail. The stochastic artefacts are not eliminated; they are the expected consequence of the approach and must be interpreted using probabilistic methods.
In 2007, the Sean Hoey trial in Northern Ireland (R v. Hoey [2007] NICC 49) became the first major UK case where LCN DNA evidence was subjected to sustained judicial scrutiny. Mr Justice Weir excluded the LCN evidence, not because the chemistry was unsound, but because the UK FSS had not implemented protocols for dealing with background contamination at the sensitivity of LCN, and the interpretation framework was insufficiently documented to allow independent scrutiny. The UK Forensic Regulator's office subsequently commissioned a review (the Caddy Report, 2008), which found LCN valid but required enhanced contamination controls and probabilistic genotyping for mixture interpretation before LCN evidence could be used in UK courts.
Equivalent debates followed in the United States (the New York City Office of the Chief Medical Examiner was the first major US laboratory to adopt enhanced-cycle-number PCR for casework, triggering a 2011-2016 inter-laboratory validation study published in Forensic Science International: Genetics) and in Australia (the Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine published validation data for a 30-cycle enhanced protocol in 2013).
In India, the CFSL laboratories have not widely adopted LCN workflows for casework; the NABL DNA testing criteria and the proposed DNA Technology Bill implementation framework do not yet specify LCN-specific validation requirements, though several academic publications from the CFSL Chandigarh and DFSS Gujarat have described enhanced-cycle amplification for challenging samples.
Practical Low-Template Workflows: Increased Cycles, Post-PCR Clean-Up and Enhanced Kits
An increased cycle protocol without enhanced contamination controls is not a low-template workflow, it is a contamination amplifier.
The operational response to a low-template sample at an accredited forensic laboratory involves three interacting decisions: which amplification protocol, which kit, and how to handle the resulting electropherogram data.
Increased cycle number is the first and most accessible adjustment. Standard kits specify 28 to 29 cycles. For template inputs between 50 and 200 pg, validated SOPs at many laboratories specify 30 to 32 cycles. For inputs below 50 pg, 34 cycles. Each additional cycle doubles the theoretical amplicon yield from any template molecule that is amplifying, including contaminant molecules. This is why enhanced contamination controls (doubled negative controls, pre-extraction UV decontamination, enhanced PPE, blanked consumable lots) are mandatory alongside any increased cycle protocol.
The Investigator 24plex GO! (Qiagen) is a kit formulated for the low-template range: it uses an optimised buffer, higher cycle number in the default protocol (34 cycles), and a shorter annealing time to favour correct-template amplification over artefact generation. AmpFlSTR MiniFiler (Applied Biosystems) and the Investigator Decaplex (Qiagen) use mini-STR primer design (amplicons below 200 bp) to maximise locus recovery from fragmented DNA where standard 400 bp amplicons would fail. These kits are widely used in cold-case re-examination, skeletal identification, and challenging contact-trace samples.
Post-PCR clean-up removes residual primers, primer dimers, and unused dNTPs from the amplification product before CE injection. At standard template inputs these are handled by the Hi-Di formamide denaturation step; at low template inputs, primer dimer peaks can obscure the small allele peaks produced by low-copy amplification. ExoSAP-IT (Applied Biosystems), which combines Exonuclease I (degrades single-stranded primers) and Shrimp Alkaline Phosphatase (dephosphorylates free dNTPs), is used in some validated low-template SOPs to clean the amplified product before CE injection.
Probabilistic genotyping is the analytical partner to low-template amplification. Software such as STRmix (developed by ESR New Zealand and the FSANZ validation consortium), TrueAllele (Cybergenetics), and EuroForMix (Oslo University Hospital) models the stochastic effects of low-template amplification probabilistically and computes a likelihood ratio that accounts for allelic drop-out and drop-in rather than forcing a binary present/absent allele call. Without probabilistic genotyping, a low-template partial profile is very difficult to interpret correctly in a mixture context, the mixture interpretation algorithms are described in mixture deconvolution and probabilistic genotyping.
| Inhibitor | Primary source | Mechanism | Remediation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Haematin | Degraded blood, blood-stained soil | Chelates Mg2+, binds Taq active site | Dilution, Chelex extraction, BSA additive |
| Humic acid | Soil, peat, compost | Intercalates into dsDNA, disrupts annealing | Dilution, ultrafiltration, BSA additive |
| Indigo | Denim fabric stains | Intercalates into template/primer duplexes | Dilution, ultrafiltration, re-extraction |
| Tannic acid | Leather goods, plant material | Binds and inactivates Taq protein | Dilution, BSA additive, Chelex chelation |
| Melanin | Hair, skin cells | Polymerase inhibition (mechanism unclear) | Dilution, ultrafiltration |
| Bile salts | Feces-contaminated surfaces | Detergent disruption of polymerase | Silica-column re-purification, dilution |
Casework Integration: Matching Kit, Template and Interpretation Framework
The decision that distinguishes a reliable forensic result from a misleading one is made before a single base pair is amplified.
In practice, the quantitation result from Section 4 of this module drives the kit and protocol selection decision described here. A high-quality extract at 0.5 to 2 ng/µL with no inhibition flag and a Degradation Index below 3 routes directly to the standard 28-cycle protocol of the laboratory's primary kit (GlobalFiler, PowerPlex Fusion 6C, Investigator 24plex QS, depending on jurisdiction and database alignment). The result can be submitted to CODIS, NDNAD, or the relevant national database under the standard analytical thresholds.
A quantitation result of 0.05 to 0.5 ng/µL with a DI below 3 and no inhibition routes to an increased-cycle protocol (30 to 32 cycles) with the same primary kit. Results are interpreted under a validated stochastic threshold.
A quantitation result with significant inhibition flags routes to dilution or re-extraction before any amplification decision. The analyst should not proceed directly to LT-PCR on an inhibited sample; the inhibition will compound the stochastic effects and produce an uninterpretable result.
A low DI but very low yield (below 50 pg) routes to a validated LT-DNA protocol: increased cycles (32 to 34), enhanced contamination controls, and probabilistic genotyping for result interpretation. The SWGDAM Low Template DNA Amplification guidelines (2010), the UK FSR Codes of Practice Annex D low template provisions (2023), and the ENFSI DNA WG Best Practice Manual for LT-DNA (2017) all govern this pathway.
A high DI combined with low yield routes to a mini-STR kit (Investigator 24plex GO!, AmpFlSTR MiniFiler) to maximise locus recovery from fragmented template, followed by probabilistic genotyping.
- Review quantitation resultCheck autosomal ng/µL, Y fraction if relevant, Degradation Index, and inhibition flags from Quantifiler Trio, Plexor HY, or InnoQuant HY.
- Select kit and protocolHigh quality, no inhibition: primary kit (GlobalFiler / PowerPlex Fusion 6C / Investigator 24plex QS), 28-29 cycles. Inhibition present: dilute or re-extract first. Low yield, low DI: increase cycle number. High DI: mini-STR kit.
- Apply contamination controlsDouble negative controls for any LT-DNA run. Verify consumable lot. UV decontaminate workspace. Document all lot numbers.
- AmplifyProFlex Thermal Cycler, Veriti, or GeneAmp 9700 on the validated programme. Document instrument ID, program name, start time, analyst ID.
- CE injectionPrepare CE injection plate in the post-PCR zone. Denature in Hi-Di formamide. Apply post-PCR clean-up (ExoSAP-IT) if validated for LT-DNA protocol.
- InterpretApply validated analytical threshold (AT). Assign alleles. For LT-DNA or mixture: apply probabilistic genotyping (STRmix, TrueAllele, EuroForMix). Calculate LR against database/reference.
- Identifiler Plus
- Applied Biosystems 16-plex STR kit covering the original 13 CODIS loci plus D2S1338, D19S433, and Amelogenin. Widely used through the 2010s; insufficient for CODIS 20 upload without supplementation.
- PowerPlex Fusion 6C
- Promega 23-plex STR kit covering all 20 CODIS core loci, all 17 ESS loci, DYS391, and Amelogenin across 6 dye channels.
- GlobalFiler
- Applied Biosystems 25-plex STR kit covering 24 STR loci plus Amelogenin, compatible with both CODIS 20 and ESS17 requirements.
- Investigator 24plex QS
- Qiagen 26-plex STR kit with Quality Sensor (IPC) and covering 24 STR loci plus DYS391 and Amelogenin. GO! variant uses increased cycles for challenging samples.
- ESSplex SE QS
- Qiagen kit covering the European Standard Set of 17 loci plus DYS391 and Amelogenin; optimised for EU Prüm database upload.
- Haematin
- Degradation product of haemoglobin that inhibits Taq polymerase by chelating Mg2+ ions and binding to the polymerase active site; most common inhibitor in blood-related forensic extracts.
- Humic acid
- Organic polymer from soil degradation that inhibits PCR by intercalating into double-stranded DNA and disrupting primer annealing.
- Low-copy-number (LCN) PCR
- PCR protocol using increased cycle numbers (typically 34 cycles) developed at the UK FSS to generate profiles from template inputs below ~100 pg; requires enhanced contamination controls and probabilistic genotyping for interpretation.
- Allelic drop-out
- Failure of one allele of a heterozygous locus to amplify detectably, a stochastic effect of low-template amplification where sampling of limited template molecules is random.
- IPC (Internal PCR Control)
- A non-forensic DNA sequence spiked into the PCR reaction at fixed concentration; a shift in IPC Ct value relative to the expected value indicates PCR inhibition.
- Probabilistic genotyping
- Computational framework (STRmix, TrueAllele, EuroForMix) that models stochastic PCR effects and computes a likelihood ratio for profile attribution, accounting for allelic drop-out and drop-in rather than requiring binary allele calls.
Frequently asked questions
What is the CODIS 20 core locus requirement and when did it come into force?
Why can LCN profiles not be interpreted using standard binary allele-calling thresholds?
What did R v. Hoey (2007) establish about LCN DNA evidence in UK courts?
Which common forensic substrates produce PCR inhibitors and how are they diagnosed?
A forensic laboratory in the United States wants to upload a DNA profile to CODIS. The profile was generated using AmpFlSTR Identifiler Plus. Is the profile eligible for CODIS upload, and why?
Test yourself on Forensic Biotechnology with free, timed mocks.
Practice Forensic Biotechnology questionsSpotted an error in this page? Report a correction or read our editorial standards.