Skip to content

Restriction Enzymes, Vectors, Ligation and Molecular Cloning

The classical recombinant DNA toolkit that powered RFLP forensics and still underpins every reagent kit on a forensic bench: restriction endonucleases and recognition sites, ligation, plasmid and BAC vectors, blue-white screening, and how each step maps to a modern forensic application.

Last updated:

Share

Every forensic DNA result traces to three tools developed between 1970 and 1985: restriction enzymes (cut DNA at precise palindromic sequences), DNA ligase (seal the joins), and plasmid vectors (propagate the fragments in bacteria). Those tools built RFLP forensics and still manufacture the allelic ladders inside every modern STR kit.

Key takeaways

  • Type II restriction endonucleases recognise 4-8 bp palindromic sequences and cut to generate sticky or blunt ends; EcoRI cuts 5'-GAATTC-3' producing a 4-base 5' AATT overhang, HinfI (G|ANTC) was the enzyme in the original Jeffreys and FBI RFLP protocols.
  • Sticky ends from the same enzyme are complementary and can base-pair before T4 DNA ligase seals the phosphodiester bond, making directional cloning and recombinant molecule assembly possible.
  • pUC19 (2,686 bp) is the standard subcloning vector for kit-component manufacturing; its blue-white screen (alpha-complementation on X-gal/IPTG plates) identifies insert-bearing white colonies from empty-vector blue colonies.
  • Bacterial Artificial Chromosomes (BACs) carrying 100-300 kb inserts were the primary substrate for the Human Genome Project, and the chromosomal coordinates of every CODIS STR locus were defined from BAC-derived sequence.
  • Every allelic ladder rung in every commercial STR multiplex kit (GlobalFiler, PowerPlex Fusion 6C, Investigator 24plex QS) was manufactured by cloning a defined repeat-count sequence into a plasmid, propagating in E. coli, and producing it at scale.

Understanding restriction enzymes and molecular cloning is not merely historical context. RFLP typing dominated forensic identification from the 1984 Nature paper through to the mid-1990s in the US and UK and was entirely a restriction enzyme assay. The population-level marker theory behind RFLP and STR profiling is covered in polymorphism, heredity and forensic markers. In jurisdictions holding legacy RFLP evidence in archived case files (including US federal cases prosecuted under the original FBI RFLP protocol and UK cases that preceded the NDNAD's STR transition), understanding the underlying chemistry is essential for cold-case review.

Restriction Endonucleases: Molecular Scissors with a Precise Address

A restriction enzyme does not cut randomly: it reads a short palindromic sequence and cuts only there, which is exactly the property that makes it analytically useful.

Restriction endonucleases are bacterial defence proteins. Bacteria use them to destroy foreign DNA (typically bacteriophage) by cleaving it at short, specific sequences, while methylating those same sequences in their own genome to protect self. From a forensic biotechnology standpoint, the interesting property is specificity: Type II restriction enzymes recognise a defined 4-8 base-pair palindromic sequence and cut double-stranded DNA at or near that site with near-perfect fidelity.

The three enzymes that appear repeatedly in forensic literature are EcoRI (from Escherichia coli RY13), HindIII (from Haemophilus influenzae Rd), and BamHI (from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens H). EcoRI recognises the sequence 5'-GAATTC-3' and cuts between G and A on each strand, producing a 4-base 5' overhang (a "sticky end") with the sequence 5'-AATT-3'. HindIII cuts 5'-AAGCTT-3', also generating 4-base 5' overhangs. BamHI recognises 5'-GGATCC-3'. Sticky ends are important because they make fragment joining thermodynamically straightforward: two fragments cut with the same enzyme carry complementary overhangs that can base-pair at low temperature before a ligase seals the phosphodiester bond.

A 6-base cutter (like EcoRI) recognises a sequence that occurs by chance roughly once every 4^6 = 4,096 base pairs in a random-sequence genome. Human genomic DNA is 3.2 × 10^9 base pairs, so a single 6-cutter generates on the order of 800,000 fragments per digest. Those fragments vary in length because the distance between any two recognition sites varies across the genome. Different individuals carry the same basic complement of EcoRI sites, but the precise distances between flanking sites at any given locus differ according to insertions, deletions, and microsatellite expansions in that region, which is the genetic variation that RFLP exploits.

Four-base cutters (for example, TaqI, recognising 5'-TCGA-3') generate fragments averaging about 256 bp, useful when degraded samples require finer resolution. Eight-base cutters (NotI, 5'-GCGGCCGC-3') cut very rarely and are used in bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) library construction rather than routine forensic RFLP.

In RFLP forensic typing, HaeIII, HinfI, MspI, PvuII, and D1Z4 probes were the workhorse combination in the FBI's original RFLP protocol (FBI RFLP SOP, 1988). The UK's original Jeffreys hypervariable probe system used HinfI. Both protocols are now historical, but forensic scientists in the US, UK, and Australia reviewing pre-STR conviction cases must interpret those legacy Southern blot autoradiograms, which requires fluency with what the enzymes actually did to the DNA. The Southern blot mechanics themselves are covered in hybridisation, blots and microarrays in forensic context.

5'-...G | AATTC-...-3'3'-...CTTAA | G-...-5'EcoRI cuts5'-...G3'-...CTTAAAATTC-...-3'G-...-5'Sticky ends (4-base 5' overhangs)Left fragmentRight fragmentLeft-fragment endsRight-fragment ends
EcoRI recognition site and cut geometry; staggered cut generates a 4-base 5'-AATT-3' overhang on each strand that serves as a sticky end for ligation.

DNA Ligation: Sealing the Join

Ligation closes the phosphodiester backbone after two sticky ends anneal; without it, no recombinant molecule can be stably propagated.

T4 DNA ligase, isolated from bacteriophage T4-infected E. coli, catalyses the formation of a phosphodiester bond between a 3'-hydroxyl and a 5'-phosphate on adjacent nucleotides within a nicked or cohesive-ended DNA molecule. It requires ATP as a cofactor and works optimally at 16°C overnight (or at room temperature with a rapid-ligation buffer for modern kits). The enzyme will join sticky ends generated by compatible restriction enzymes, or blunt ends (though blunt-end ligation is less efficient and requires higher ligase concentrations and longer incubation).

In recombinant DNA cloning, ligation connects a restriction-digested insert (say, a 500 bp PCR product flanked by EcoRI sites) to a linearised vector that has been cut with the same enzyme. The compatible overhangs base-pair at low temperature; T4 ligase then seals the nick on each strand. At low molar ratios of vector to insert, the vector tends to re-ligate with itself (circularisation without insert), which is why most cloning protocols treat the vector with calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase (CIP) first: CIP removes the 5'-phosphate from the linearised vector, preventing self-ligation (because T4 ligase cannot form a phosphodiester bond without a 5'-phosphate). Only when the insert provides a 5'-phosphate at the join site can ligation proceed, a trick that dramatically improves the fraction of recombinant colonies.

In the forensic context, ligation chemistry underlies every kit that uses a positive-control cloned plasmid. The Identifiler Plus STR kit, the GlobalFiler kit, and comparable Promega PowerPlex products all contain pre-amplified allelic ladder components and internal-positive-control templates that were manufactured by cloning specific sequences into vectors, ligating, transforming into bacteria, and propagating at scale. The ability to read that product relies on the precision of the original restriction-enzyme cut and ligation that built the construct.

Ligation is also the chemistry behind the adaptors used in next-generation sequencing library preparation. Illumina library prep ligates short Y-shaped adaptors (carrying primer-binding sites and index sequences) onto restriction-digested or mechanically sheared DNA fragments. Oxford Nanopore sequencing ligates motor-protein-tethered adaptors onto the ends of native DNA molecules. Both are direct descendants of the ligation chemistry developed for molecular cloning.

Plasmid and BAC Vectors: Carrying Inserts into a Host

A vector is not just a delivery vehicle; its design determines how many copies propagate, how inserts are selected, and how the cloned sequence is eventually recovered.

A cloning vector must satisfy four properties: it must replicate autonomously inside a bacterial host; it must carry a selectable marker so bacteria that took up the vector can be distinguished from those that did not; it must have a unique cloning site (or multiple cloning site) into which the insert is placed; and it must be small enough to be introduced into bacteria by transformation. Plasmids satisfy all four requirements.

pBR322 was the first widely used general cloning vector, constructed in 1977 by Bolivar, Rodriguez, Rodriguez, Betlach, Covarrubias, Heyneker, Boyer, and Goodman at UCSF. It is a 4,361 bp circular plasmid carrying two antibiotic-resistance genes (ampicillin-resistance, bla; and tetracycline-resistance, tet) and a ColE1-type origin of replication that allows roughly 20-30 copies per cell. Many restriction sites fall within the two resistance genes: inserting a fragment at the ClaI or HindIII site within tet disrupts the tetracycline-resistance gene, allowing insertional inactivation screening (colonies carrying an insert are ampicillin-resistant but tetracycline-sensitive).

pUC19, designed by Vieira and Messing in 1982 and refined through successive generations, is a 2,686 bp derivative carrying a high-copy-number pMB1 origin (which can reach 500-700 copies per cell under certain growth conditions), an ampicillin-resistance marker, and an lacZ-alpha fragment encoding the N-terminal portion of beta-galactosidase. Within lacZ-alpha sits a polylinker (multiple cloning site, MCS) containing sites for HindIII, SphI, PstI, SalI/AccI/HincII, AccI, XmaI/SmaI, BamHI, XmaI, SmaI, KpnI, SacI, and EcoRI. Inserting a fragment into the MCS disrupts lacZ-alpha, allowing blue-white screening: colonies in which a foreign insert is cloned appear white on X-gal/IPTG plates (the enzyme fragment cannot form a functional beta-galactosidase), while empty-vector re-ligations give blue colonies. pUC19 is the workhorse for sub-cloning PCR products, probe fragments, and STR ladder constructs in kit manufacturing.

For larger inserts, Bacterial Artificial Chromosomes (BACs) are the vector of choice. BACs are derived from the F-plasmid of E. coli and can carry inserts of 100-300 kilobases at roughly one copy per cell. The Human Genome Project (HGP), which produced the first draft human genome sequence in 2001, used BAC libraries as its primary cloning substrate: genomic DNA was partially digested with BamHI or HindIII, size-selected on a pulsed-field gel, and ligated into a BAC vector. Each BAC clone was then sequenced by the Sanger chain-termination method, the chemistry behind which is described in Sanger sequencing chemistry and modern methods. In a direct forensic connection, the BAC-based tiling path of the human genome provided the reference coordinates against which forensic STR loci are mapped: D3S1358 at 3p21.31, D8S1179 at 8q24.13, and so on through the CODIS 20 loci. That map was built on BAC libraries.

pMB1 ori (highcopy)bla (Amp-R)lacZ-alphaMCS (polylinker)pUC192,686 bpBlue colony:empty vectorWhite colony:insert presentFunctional lacZ-alpha (blue)Disrupted lacZ-alpha (white)
pUC19 cloning vector map showing the MCS within lacZ-alpha and the ampicillin-resistance gene; insert cloning into the MCS disrupts lacZ-alpha, giving white colonies on X-gal plates.

Blue-White Screening and Colony Selection

Blue-white screening is one of the first visual assays in molecular biology, and it encapsulates how selection markers transform a biochemical probability into a visible phenotype.

After transformation of E. coli with a ligation reaction, bacteria are plated on LB agar containing the antibiotic (ampicillin for pUC19), the chromogenic substrate X-gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-beta-D-galactopyranoside), and the inducer IPTG (isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside). Bacteria that did not take up the plasmid are killed by ampicillin. Among ampicillin-resistant colonies, those whose lacZ-alpha reading frame is intact produce functional beta-galactosidase, which cleaves X-gal to release 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indol, which spontaneously dimerises to an insoluble blue indigo compound. Colonies with an intact insert in the MCS have their reading frame disrupted by the insertion, so they produce no functional fragment and remain white.

This screen is not foolproof. Small deletions within the insert can restore the reading frame and give false blue colonies. Re-ligated empty vector (if CIP treatment was incomplete) also gives blue colonies. Modern protocols address this by PCR-screening white colonies directly with primers flanking the MCS (M13 forward and reverse primers in the pUC/pBlueScript system) before committing to overnight liquid culture and mini-prep extraction.

pBlueScript (pBS) (Stratagene, now Agilent) is a pUC derivative that adds the T7 and T3 RNA polymerase promoter sites flanking the MCS, enabling in vitro transcription of the cloned insert into RNA, which is then labelled and used as a probe. This is directly relevant to early Southern blot forensic work: many of the minisatellite probes used in the original Jeffreys multi-locus probes (33.15 and 33.6, published in Nature 1985) were produced by in vitro transcription from pUC/pBS derivatives containing hypervariable minisatellite inserts.

In the UK, Australia, and the US, forensic labs that produced RFLP evidence between 1986 and approximately 1999 manufactured or purchased probe preparations derived from this exact workflow: cloning a hypervariable locus into a plasmid vector, growing it at scale, linearising the vector with a flanking restriction enzyme, labelling the probe by nick translation or random priming, and hybridising it to a Southern membrane carrying digested genomic DNA. The resulting autoradiogram became the admissible evidence. Understanding the cloning steps that produced the probe is necessary for any forensic scientist called to defend the methodology in a cold-case review or post-conviction DNA re-examination.

Transformation, Propagation and Mini-Prep Recovery

A ligated molecule that stays in a test tube has no forensic value; transformation delivers it into a bacterial host that replicates it millions of times over.

Transformation is the introduction of exogenous DNA into a bacterial cell. For laboratory cloning, two methods dominate. Calcium chloride chemical competence: cells are harvested in log phase, washed twice with ice-cold CaCl2 solution, and held on ice. Plasmid DNA is added; a brief 42°C heat shock for 45 seconds opens transient membrane pores through which the DNA enters; cells recover in rich medium for 60-90 minutes before plating. Efficiencies of 10^6-10^8 transformants per microgram of supercoiled plasmid are typical. Electroporation: cells and DNA are mixed in a chilled cuvette; a single high-voltage pulse (2.5 kV, 25 µF, 200 ohms for E. coli) generates a transient electric field that briefly disrupts the outer and inner membranes. Electroporation gives 10^9-10^10 transformants per microgram, important when library diversity must be maximised.

Once transformed, individual colonies on an agar plate represent single recombinant clones. A chosen colony is grown in overnight liquid culture (typically 5-10 mL LB + antibiotic), and the plasmid is recovered by alkaline lysis mini-prep: cells are lysed with 0.2 M NaOH / 1% SDS; chromosomal DNA and proteins precipitate when the lysate is neutralised with sodium acetate; the cleared supernatant is loaded onto a silica-column or extracted with phenol-chloroform. The resulting plasmid prep is then restriction-digested to verify insert size, or directly sequenced.

This workflow is how allelic ladders for commercial STR kits are built. Promega's PowerPlex Fusion 6C kit, Applied Biosystems' GlobalFiler kit, Qiagen's Investigator 24plex QS kit: every allelic standard in every forensic STR multiplex was manufactured starting from a cloned plasmid construct propagated in E. coli by exactly this sequence of steps. These kit-run allelic ladders are interpreted on the electropherogram using the capillary electrophoresis workflow. The ability to produce unlimited amounts of a defined-length DNA molecule, each copy identical, is the forensic value of molecular cloning: a ladder standard that is inconsistent or contaminated invalidates an entire electropherogram run. Consistency in ladder manufacture depends on clonal propagation from a single colony.

In India, the Central Forensic Science Laboratory (CFSL) in Hyderabad and its regional counterparts validate commercial STR kits under NABL ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation. Kit validation includes sequencing of allelic ladder components to confirm that each ladder rung represents the expected repeat number, a step that requires understanding the cloning basis of how that ladder was manufactured. The same validation discipline applies in FBI-accredited labs in the US and in ENFSI-member state forensic institutes across the EU.

From RFLP to Modern Kits: The Forensic Thread

Every time a forensic examiner loads a GlobalFiler plate run, the biology of restriction enzymes, vectors, and bacterial cloning is silently embedded in the reagent pouch.

RFLP forensic typing (1985-1999) used restriction enzymes as the primary analytical step. Genomic DNA was digested with HaeIII, HinfI, or PvuII; fragments were separated on an agarose gel; transferred to a nylon membrane by Southern blotting; and hybridised with a radiolabelled or chemiluminescent probe specific to a hypervariable locus. The fragment length at each locus was measured by comparison with a molecular-weight ladder run in an adjacent lane. The match between a suspect's and a crime-stain's RFLP pattern across five to seven loci provided match probabilities sufficient for court presentation. Colin Pitchfork's 1986 conviction for the murders of Lynda Mann and Dawn Ashworth in Leicestershire, the first criminal conviction based on DNA evidence, used precisely this approach. Alec Jeffreys, working at the University of Leicester, produced multi-locus RFLP profiles from crime-scene stains under conditions approved by the Home Office pathology service, presenting them in evidence that was accepted by Leicester Crown Court.

The transition from RFLP to STR (beginning in the early 1990s in the US at the FBI, and from 1995 onward in the UK with the establishment of the National DNA Database) did not abandon restriction enzymes or cloning. Rather, it changed where those tools operated: instead of at the forensic bench, they moved to the reagent factory. STR allelic ladders, internal-positive-control DNAs, and sensitivity-panel constructs are all cloned plasmid products. The ABI Identifiler Plus Kit, released in 2003, contained a 9947A positive-control DNA derived from a blood donor whose profile had been sequenced at all 15 loci and certified; the allelic ladder for each of those 15 loci was manufactured from cloned constructs. The successor GlobalFiler Kit (2012), with its 21 autosomal loci, required 21 separate ladder constructs, each built by the restriction-enzyme-ligation-transformation route described in this topic.

Next-generation sequencing has added a further layer: the library preparation that precedes Illumina or Oxford Nanopore sequencing relies on ligation of platform-specific adaptors onto restriction-digested or sheared DNA. Illumina's DNA Nano Library Prep (used with MiSeq for forensic SNP sequencing) uses ligation-mediated adaptor attachment; Verogen's MiSeq FGx forensic genomics platform (the NGS route to STR + SNP combination typing) uses a similar workflow. Even the Oxford Nanopore MinION (the pocket-sized sequencer now being evaluated in field-deployable forensic scenarios by groups at King's College London and the Forensic Science Service successor bodies in the UK) attaches its motor-protein tether via a ligation step before the molecule threads through the nanopore.

The molecular cloning toolkit is, in this sense, invisible infrastructure. A forensic examiner running GlobalFiler on an ABI 3500xl sees an electropherogram, not a restriction enzyme. But the restriction enzymes, the ligation chemistry, the pUC vectors, and the blue-white screen are the foundational layer on which every modern forensic DNA result rests.

EnzymeRecognition SiteCut TypeForensic / Lab Use
EcoRI5'-G|AATTC-3'5' sticky end (4-nt)Subcloning probes, library construction
HindIII5'-A|AGCTT-3'5' sticky end (4-nt)BAC library digestion, pBR322 tet-disruption
BamHI5'-G|GATCC-3'5' sticky end (4-nt)Common MCS partner enzyme in pUC/pBS vectors
HinfI5'-G|ANTC-3'5' sticky end (3-nt, degenerate)FBI + Jeffreys original RFLP typing protocol
HaeIII5'-GG|CC-3'Blunt endForensic RFLP typing; still used in historical re-reviews
NotI5'-GC|GGCCGC-3'5' sticky end (8-nt, 8-cutter)BAC insert excision; rare-cutting lambda ladders
  1. Digest insert and vector
    Cut both the target DNA (insert) and the cloning vector with the same restriction enzyme(s). This generates compatible sticky ends on both molecules. For forensic probe work, the insert is typically a PCR product flanked by artificial restriction sites added to the PCR primers.
  2. Dephosphorylate vector
    Treat the linearised vector with calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase (CIP) to remove the 5'-phosphate groups. This prevents the vector from re-ligating with itself, greatly increasing the proportion of recombinant (insert-containing) colonies.
  3. Ligate insert into vector
    Mix insert and vector at a molar ratio of approximately 3:1 (insert:vector). Incubate with T4 DNA ligase overnight at 16°C or 1 hour at 25°C with rapid-ligation buffer. The compatible overhangs anneal and the ligase seals the phosphodiester bonds.
  4. Transform into competent E. coli
    Introduce the ligation reaction into chemically competent (CaCl2) or electrocompetent E. coli DH5alpha or TOP10 cells. Heat-shock at 42°C for 45 seconds (chemical) or electroporate at 2.5 kV (electrical). Recover in SOC medium for 60-90 minutes.
  5. Plate on selective medium with X-gal / IPTG
    Spread transformed cells on LB-ampicillin plates containing X-gal and IPTG. Incubate at 37°C overnight. Empty-vector colonies appear blue; recombinant (insert-containing) colonies appear white.
  6. Screen and mini-prep
    Pick white colonies into liquid culture. Isolate plasmid DNA by alkaline-lysis mini-prep. Verify by restriction digest (diagnostic gel) or colony PCR. Sequence confirmed clones to check fidelity of insert sequence.
Key terms
Type II restriction endonuclease
A bacterial enzyme that cleaves double-stranded DNA at a specific palindromic recognition sequence, generating fragments whose ends reflect the exact geometry of the cut site (sticky or blunt). The class most useful in molecular biology and forensic applications.
Sticky end (cohesive end)
A single-stranded overhang generated when two cuts on opposite strands of a DNA duplex are offset rather than directly opposite each other. Complementary sticky ends from two fragments cut with the same enzyme can base-pair, facilitating ligation.
Plasmid
A small, circular, double-stranded DNA molecule that replicates autonomously inside a bacterial cell. Used as a cloning vector when equipped with a selectable antibiotic-resistance marker, an origin of replication, and a multiple cloning site.
Multiple cloning site (MCS)
A short stretch of synthetic DNA containing a cluster of unique restriction sites, engineered into cloning vectors such as pUC19 and pBlueScript to provide multiple insertion options for foreign DNA.
Blue-white screening (alpha-complementation)
A colony selection method for pUC-family vectors in which intact lacZ-alpha produces functional beta-galactosidase that cleaves X-gal to a blue indigo product. Insertion of foreign DNA into the MCS disrupts the reading frame, giving white colonies.
Bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC)
An F-plasmid-derived cloning vector capable of carrying 100-300 kb inserts stably in E. coli at one copy per cell. The Human Genome Project used BAC libraries as its primary substrate; BAC-derived sequence coordinates define the physical map positions of forensic STR loci.
RFLP (restriction fragment length polymorphism)
Variation in the length of DNA fragments produced by digestion of genomic DNA with a restriction enzyme, due to differences in the spacing between restriction sites at a hypervariable locus. RFLP typing was the first DNA-based forensic identification method (Jeffreys, 1984-1986).

Frequently asked questions

How does a restriction enzyme generate RFLP alleles?
A restriction endonuclease recognises a specific 4-8 bp palindromic sequence and cuts both strands at that site. RFLP alleles arise because individuals differ in the number of tandem repeats between two flanking restriction sites at a hypervariable VNTR locus: more repeats produce a longer fragment that migrates higher on the gel. The enzyme does not cut within the repeat; it cuts at the flanking recognition sites, and the distance between those cuts reflects the repeat copy number.
What does blue-white screening detect in molecular cloning?
pUC vectors carry a lacZ-alpha fragment in their multiple cloning site. On X-gal/IPTG plates, cells with intact lacZ-alpha produce beta-galactosidase that cleaves X-gal to a blue product. An insert disrupting the MCS prevents functional enzyme formation, giving white colonies. White colonies carry an insert; blue colonies are empty re-ligated vector. The screen identifies successful ligation events without sequencing every colony.
Why are restriction enzymes still forensically relevant when PCR-based STR typing has replaced RFLP?
Restriction enzymes are no longer used in routine DNA profiling. Their forensic relevance is in post-conviction reviews of pre-1999 RFLP evidence: where autoradiograms and gel records are the only surviving evidence, a reviewing expert must understand recognition-site geometry, fragment-length assignment, and match-window criteria from the original RFLP SOP to evaluate whether the analysis was conducted correctly.
Why did RFLP require so much more DNA than STR typing?
RFLP does not amplify the target; it detects the genomic copy number directly (two copies per diploid cell). Producing a visible hybridisation band required 100-500 ng of intact, high-molecular-weight DNA. PCR amplification copies the STR target roughly 10^6-fold, so even 0.5 ng yields sufficient product. RFLP also required unfragmented DNA, because the VNTR-containing fragment must migrate at the correct molecular weight on the gel.
Practice
Question 1 of 5· 0 answered

EcoRI cuts DNA at the sequence 5'-GAATTC-3'. If a human genome averages 4^6 base pairs between any two EcoRI sites, approximately how many EcoRI fragments are generated from a 3.2 × 10^9 bp diploid genome?

Test yourself on Forensic Biotechnology with free, timed mocks.

Practice Forensic Biotechnology questions

Found this useful? Pass it along.

Share

Spotted an error in this page? Report a correction or read our editorial standards.

Your journey to becoming a forensic professional starts here.

Practice with mock tests, learn from structured notes, and get your questions answered by a global forensic community, all in one place.