Skip to content

R V. Pora (2015 UKPC)

Definition

Judicial Committee of the Privy Council decision quashing Teina Pora's New Zealand murder conviction based on neuropsychological evidence that FASD-related frontal-lobe impairment made his false confession neurologically explicable.

Court
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
Year
2015
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Key evidence
Neuropsychological / FASD evidence

Common questions

Why was neuropsychological evidence central to overturning Pora's conviction?+

Expert evidence showed his fetal alcohol spectrum disorder caused frontal-lobe impairment that made him unusually suggestible and prone to confabulation, giving a scientific explanation for a detailed false confession the original jury had no way to evaluate.

What broader legal point does the Pora case illustrate?+

It shows appellate courts increasingly accepting neuroscientific evidence to explain the reliability of a confession itself, not just to argue diminished culpability, reshaping how false-confession claims can be litigated on appeal.

Related terms

BNS § 22
India's insanity defence provision in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, replacing IPC § 84: an act is not an offence if done...
BSA § 39
Section 39 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 (formerly IEA § 45), governing the admissibility of expert opinion in Indian courts. The...
Diminished Responsibility
A partial defence that reduces murder to manslaughter in the UK (Homicide Act 1957 § 2 as amended by Coroners and Justice...
Foetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD)
A range of conditions caused by prenatal alcohol exposure, producing structural and functional frontal-lobe impairment. Directly relevant to false-confession vulnerability, as established...
MacArthur Law and Neuroscience Project
A MacArthur Foundation-funded research network (2007-2017) producing the leading academic framework for integrating neuroscience into criminal law, distinguishing group-level findings from individual-level...
Miller V. Alabama (2012)
US Supreme Court ruling prohibiting mandatory life-without-parole sentences for offenders who were under 18 at the time of their offence, on the...
Neurolaw
The interdisciplinary field at the intersection of neuroscience and criminal law, addressing how brain science can and should inform legal concepts of...
Prefrontal Cortex (PFC)
The frontal brain region responsible for impulse control, planning, and decision-making. Reduced grey matter volume and lower activation in the PFC have...
Roper V. Simmons (2005)
US Supreme Court decision prohibiting capital punishment for offenders who were under 18 at the time of their crime, resting in part...

Explained in

Your journey to becoming a forensic professional starts here.

Practice with mock tests, learn from structured notes, and get your questions answered by a global forensic community, all in one place.