Skip to content

MacArthur Law and Neuroscience Project

Definition

A MacArthur Foundation-funded research network (2007-2017) producing the leading academic framework for integrating neuroscience into criminal law, distinguishing group-level findings from individual-level attribution.

Funder
MacArthur Foundation
Active years
2007-2017
Focus
Integrating neuroscience into criminal law
Key distinction
Group-level findings vs individual-level attribution

Common questions

Why is the group-level versus individual-level distinction central to its work?+

Neuroscience studies typically show average differences across groups, but a court needs to know about one specific defendant. The project's central caution is that a group-level finding cannot be directly translated into a claim about that individual's culpability.

What kind of legal questions did the project examine?+

It examined topics such as juvenile brain development and culpability, addiction and self-control, and how neuroimaging evidence should, and should not, be weighed in criminal responsibility and sentencing determinations.

Related terms

BNS § 22
India's insanity defence provision in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, replacing IPC § 84: an act is not an offence if done...
BSA § 39
Section 39 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 (formerly IEA § 45), governing the admissibility of expert opinion in Indian courts. The...
Diminished Responsibility
A partial defence that reduces murder to manslaughter in the UK (Homicide Act 1957 § 2 as amended by Coroners and Justice...
Foetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD)
A range of conditions caused by prenatal alcohol exposure, producing structural and functional frontal-lobe impairment. Directly relevant to false-confession vulnerability, as established...
Miller V. Alabama (2012)
US Supreme Court ruling prohibiting mandatory life-without-parole sentences for offenders who were under 18 at the time of their offence, on the...
Neurolaw
The interdisciplinary field at the intersection of neuroscience and criminal law, addressing how brain science can and should inform legal concepts of...
Prefrontal Cortex (PFC)
The frontal brain region responsible for impulse control, planning, and decision-making. Reduced grey matter volume and lower activation in the PFC have...
R V. Pora (2015 UKPC)
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council decision quashing Teina Pora's New Zealand murder conviction based on neuropsychological evidence that FASD-related frontal-lobe impairment...
Roper V. Simmons (2005)
US Supreme Court decision prohibiting capital punishment for offenders who were under 18 at the time of their crime, resting in part...

Explained in

Your journey to becoming a forensic professional starts here.

Practice with mock tests, learn from structured notes, and get your questions answered by a global forensic community, all in one place.