Skip to content

Verification Phase

Definition

The fourth ACE-V phase: an independent second examiner repeats the ACE process without access to the first examiner's conclusion, providing an independent check on the opinion.

Position
Fourth and final phase of ACE-V
Requirement
Second examiner works blind to the first examiner's conclusion
Purpose
Independent check on the original examination and opinion
Applies to
Latent print and handwriting comparison casework

Common questions

Does verification always mean the full ACE-V process is repeated blind?+

Ideally yes, but in practice many labs allow the verifying examiner to see the first examiner's conclusion beforehand, which is a documented critique because it can bias the verifier toward agreement.

Is verification the same as a peer review of the conclusion?+

No, verification is meant to be an independent repetition of the analysis, comparison, and evaluation phases, not simply a second person checking whether the stated conclusion looks reasonable.

Related terms

ACE-V
Analysis, Comparison, Evaluation, Verification: the four-stage method for latent print examination used by accredited forensic fingerprint laboratories. Analysis examines the latent in...
Analysis Phase
The first ACE-V phase: the questioned writing is examined in isolation, individual features are catalogued, and the documentation is locked before the...
Comparison Phase
The second ACE-V phase: the catalogued features of the questioned writing are evaluated against the exemplar set, documenting both similarities and differences...
Daubert Criteria
The four criteria a US federal court applies to assess the admissibility of expert scientific testimony: has the methodology been tested, has...
Evaluation Phase
The third ACE-V phase: the combined weight of similarities and differences is expressed as a conclusion on the SWGDOC nine-point scale or...
Linear ACE-V
An implementation of ACE-V methodology that enforces strict sequential documentation: analysis of the latent mark must be completed and recorded before the...
Sequential Unmasking
An information-sequencing protocol in which the examiner receives the questioned material first, completes and documents the analysis before receiving the known standards,...
SWGDOC Nine-Point Scale
The conclusion scale developed by the Scientific Working Group for Forensic Document Examination, running from 'identification' (most positive) through 'no conclusion' (midpoint)...
Target-Shifting
The cognitive bias whereby an examiner's perception of the questioned writing is unconsciously shaped by prior knowledge of what the exemplar writer's...

Explained in

Your journey to becoming a forensic professional starts here.

Practice with mock tests, learn from structured notes, and get your questions answered by a global forensic community, all in one place.