Skip to content

Smith V. Jones (1999)

Definition

Canadian Supreme Court decision establishing that solicitor-client privilege and professional confidentiality can be overridden where there is a serious, clear, and imminent risk of harm to an identifiable person.

Court
Supreme Court of Canada
Year
1999
Subject
Exception to solicitor-client privilege
Standard set
Serious, clear, and imminent risk to an identifiable person

Common questions

What professional obligation does this case affect?+

It sets the threshold at which confidentiality or privilege can be overridden to warn or protect a specific identifiable person facing serious risk of harm, rather than confidentiality applying without exception.

Is the standard limited to lawyers and their clients?+

The case concerned solicitor-client privilege specifically, but its serious, clear, and imminent risk standard is frequently cited by analogy in mental health and forensic ethics discussions of duty to warn.

Related terms

APA Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychology (2013)
The eleven-section APA document setting professional and ethical standards for forensic psychological practice in the US, covering responsibilities, competence, diligence, relationships, fees,...
BPS Division of Forensic Psychology Practice Guidelines 2017
The UK professional standards document for Chartered Forensic Psychologists, structured around six competency domains: knowledge/skills/values, assessment, formulation, intervention, evaluation, and communication.
Contingency Fee Prohibition
The APA Specialty Guidelines Section 5 prohibition on forensic psychologists accepting fees contingent on the outcome of proceedings, because such arrangements create...
Cross-Cultural Competence
The requirement under APA and BPS DFP guidelines that forensic psychologists be aware of cultural and linguistic factors affecting assessment validity, and...
HCPC
Health and Care Professions Council; the UK statutory regulator that holds the protected title 'Forensic Psychologist' under the Health Professions Order 2001...
Mental Healthcare Act 2017
Indian legislation governing mental health services and the rights of persons with mental illness; Section 23 protects confidentiality of mental health information...
Pre-Assessment Notification
The APA Specialty Guidelines Section 6 requirement to inform the person being assessed, before evaluation begins, of the purpose, the requesting party,...
Rehabilitation Council of India
Indian statutory body regulating clinical psychology (and related professions); requires M.Phil. (Clinical Psychology) as the minimum registration qualification; no distinct forensic psychology...
Tarasoff V. Regents of the University of California (1976)
California Supreme Court decision establishing a psychotherapist's duty to protect identifiable third parties from a patient's communicated serious threats of violence; adopted...
W V. Edgell (1990)
England and Wales Court of Appeal decision permitting a psychiatrist to disclose a confined patient's dangerous propensities to the Home Secretary where...

Explained in

Your journey to becoming a forensic professional starts here.

Practice with mock tests, learn from structured notes, and get your questions answered by a global forensic community, all in one place.