Skip to content

Slick-Sherman-Iverson Criteria

Definition

1999 classification framework for Malingered Neurocognitive Dysfunction; four levels (Definite, Probable, Possible, Not MND) based on convergent evidence criteria.

Year introduced
1999
Target condition
Malingered Neurocognitive Dysfunction
Classification levels
Definite, Probable, Possible, Not MND
Basis
Convergent evidence criteria

Common questions

What does convergent evidence mean in this framework?+

A classification relies on multiple independent indicators, such as performance-validity test failures and self-report inconsistencies, all pointing the same direction, rather than a single test result deciding the level.

How is the framework used in practice?+

It gives forensic evaluators a standard set of levels to grade how confident a finding of malingered neurocognitive dysfunction is, supporting consistent reporting across cases.

Related terms

Below-Chance Performance
Performance on a two-alternative forced-choice task below the 50% chance level; statistically impossible through genuine impairment; meets SSI Criteria Group A for...
Factitious Disorder
Intentional production of symptoms motivated by psychological need to assume the sick role, without external incentive; distinct from malingering in motivation; not...
M-FAST
Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test; 25-item brief screen for feigned psychopathology; designed for jail and pretrial settings where full SIRS-2 is...
MAL (Malingering Index)
PAI configuration-based supplementary index developed for forensic populations to detect feigned psychopathology; used alongside NIM and clinical scales.
Malingering
Intentional production of false or grossly exaggerated symptoms motivated by external incentives; a DSM-5 V-code (not a mental disorder) applicable when incentive...
Performance Validity Test (PVT)
Any test designed to detect inadequate effort or deliberate underperformance in cognitive assessment; TOMM is the leading example for memory; embedded PVTs...
Response Style
The systematic approach an individual uses in reporting symptoms and behaviour during assessment; includes genuine, amplification, fabrication, defensiveness, and random responding.
Rogers Detection of Deception Model
Multi-source, hypothesis-testing framework for response-style assessment; requires convergent evidence from at least two data sources and explicit consideration of alternative hypotheses before...
SIRS-2
Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms, Second Edition; 172-item structured interview with eight primary scales for detecting feigned psychiatric symptoms; yields genuine, indeterminate,...
Symptom Amplification
Exaggeration of genuine symptoms beyond their actual severity; common and does not automatically meet the malingering threshold; requires integration with all assessment...
TOMM
Test of Memory Malingering; 50-item forced-choice visual recognition task; Trial 2 score below 45/50 indicates performance invalidity; most widely validated memory PVT.

Explained in

Your journey to becoming a forensic professional starts here.

Practice with mock tests, learn from structured notes, and get your questions answered by a global forensic community, all in one place.