Skip to content

Sequential Lineup

Definition

A lineup in which members are presented one at a time, with the witness making a yes/no decision on each before seeing the next. Encourages absolute judgement. Proposed by Lindsay and Wells (1985); shows reduced false identifications and a better diagnostic ratio when properly administered.

Presentation
One member at a time
Decision required
Yes/no per member before seeing the next
Judgement type encouraged
Absolute, not relative
Proposed by
Lindsay and Wells
Year
1985

Common questions

Why does a sequential lineup reduce false identifications compared to a simultaneous one?+

Viewing members one at a time discourages the witness from comparing lineup members against each other and simply picking whoever looks most like the perpetrator relative to the rest, a relative-judgement strategy that increases the risk of misidentifying an innocent filler when the true perpetrator is absent.

What does 'properly administered' mean in the context of sequential lineup benefits?+

The documented benefits assume double-blind administration, where the administrator does not know who the suspect is, along with instructions that the perpetrator may not be present and that the witness cannot go back to a previous member, since deviations from these procedures can erode the sequential advantage.

What is the diagnostic ratio, and why is it used to compare lineup methods?+

The diagnostic ratio compares the rate of correct identifications of guilty suspects to the rate of mistaken identifications of innocent suspects, giving a single measure of how well a lineup procedure discriminates guilt from innocence rather than looking at identification rates alone.

Related terms

BNSS 2023 § 54
The Indian statutory provision governing identification parades, replacing CrPC § 9. Requires the parade to be held before a magistrate with persons...
Double-Blind Administration
Lineup administration by an officer who does not know which member is the suspect. Removes the possibility of administrator cue effects. The...
Functional Size
The number of lineup members who are plausible perpetrators given the witness's prior description. A lineup with nominal size six but functional...
Must-Be-There Bias
The tendency of witnesses to make a lineup identification even when uncertain, if they believe the perpetrator is present. Substantially reduced by...
Relative Judgement
The cognitive strategy of comparing lineup members to each other and selecting the best match to memory. Encouraged by the simultaneous format...
Simultaneous Lineup
A lineup in which the witness views all persons or photographs at the same time and selects one. Encourages relative judgement (who...
VIPER System
Video Identification Parade Electronic Recording, the default identification procedure in England and Wales since 2003. Uses standardised database clips administered by an...

Explained in

Your journey to becoming a forensic professional starts here.

Practice with mock tests, learn from structured notes, and get your questions answered by a global forensic community, all in one place.