Practice with mock tests, learn from structured notes, and get your questions answered by a global forensic community, all in one place.
The three major dental numbering systems, how each maps the 32 permanent and 20 deciduous teeth, how to convert between them, and why a shared notation is essential for cross-border identification cases.
Last updated:
Imagine a postmortem dental chart completed by a Brazilian odontologist using FDI notation is sent to a US dental office that recorded ante-mortem films in Universal numbers. The mandibular right first molar is recorded in the postmortem chart as tooth 46. The US record says tooth 30. Both are correct. Both are describing the same tooth. But if the examiner comparing them does not know both systems, they will record a discrepancy that does not exist and miss a match that might close the identification.
Three numbering systems dominate clinical and forensic dental practice: the FDI two-digit system used in most of the world and on INTERPOL forms, the Universal system standard in North America, and the Palmer notation used across much of the United Kingdom, Ireland, and Australia. They are not interchangeable by inspection. Each maps the dentition on a different logic, and conversion between them requires explicit knowledge of all three.
This topic gives a working command of all three systems. It covers how each system encodes quadrant and position, walks through the full mapping for the permanent dentition, addresses deciduous notation, shows how to convert in both directions with a reference table, and explains why notation standardisation at the start of a case, before any comparison is attempted, is a necessary procedural step rather than an optional formality.
One quadrant digit plus one position digit covers every tooth in every patient.
The FDI World Dental Federation system was introduced in 1970 and is now the most widely adopted system globally. Its logic is straightforward: each tooth is described by two digits. The first digit names the quadrant; the second names the tooth's position within that quadrant counting from the midline outward.
Thirty-two numbers, one sequence, the American standard.
The Universal system numbers all 32 permanent teeth in a single uninterrupted sequence that begins at the maxillary right third molar and runs clockwise around the arches back to the mandibular right third molar. The starting point is arbitrary, chosen when the system was adopted by the American Dental Association in 1975, but the sequence is now fixed in North American clinical records and in the software systems used by most US dental practices.
Starting at the maxillary right third molar (tooth 1) the sequence crosses the upper arch from right to left: 1 through 16 covers the entire maxillary arch, ending at the maxillary left third molar. The count then drops to the mandibular arch and continues from left to right: 17 (mandibular left third molar) through 32 (mandibular right third molar). Deciduous teeth use the letters A through T in the same clockwise order, starting at the maxillary right second molar (A) and ending at the mandibular right second molar (T).
A grid drawn on paper, intuitive at the chairside but invisible in plain text.
Palmer notation, developed by American dentist Corydon Palmer in 1870 and refined by the dental anatomist Zsigmondy, uses a graphical quadrant symbol rather than a numeric code. A horizontal line separates the upper arch from the lower. A vertical line separates the left half from the right. Together they form a cross, and each of the four right-angle bracket symbols that result from this cross marks a different quadrant.
Within each quadrant the tooth is identified by a number from 1 to 8 for permanent teeth (1 = central incisor, 8 = third molar, counting from midline outward) or a letter A to E for deciduous teeth (A = central incisor, E = second molar). The bracket tells you which quadrant; the number tells you which tooth. To write Palmer notation in plain text, the quadrant is indicated by placing the number inside or adjacent to the appropriate bracket character. In print and in electronic records Palmer is often rendered with a superscript or subscript depending on arch, which creates ambiguity when text is copied into a different system.
The same tooth, three names: a conversion table removes ambiguity at the comparison stage.
The safest approach at the start of any cross-border comparison is to write out the full conversion for the key teeth before comparing records. The table below covers the complete permanent maxillary right quadrant as an example. The full 32-tooth conversion follows the same logic.
| Tooth | FDI | Universal | Palmer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max right central incisor | 11 | 8 | 1 (UR bracket) |
| Max right lateral incisor | 12 | 7 | 2 (UR bracket) |
| Max right canine | 13 | 6 | 3 (UR bracket) |
| Max right first premolar | 14 | 5 | 4 (UR bracket) |
| Max right second premolar | 15 | 4 | 5 (UR bracket) |
| Max right first molar | 16 | 3 | 6 (UR bracket) |
| Max right second molar | 17 | 2 | 7 (UR bracket) |
| Max right third molar | 18 | 1 | 8 (UR bracket) |
| Mand right first molar | 46 | 30 | 6 (LR bracket) |
| Mand left first molar | 36 | 19 | 6 (LL bracket) |
Notice that the FDI second digit always runs from 1 at the midline to 8 at the back. Universal numbers run in the opposite direction in the upper arch (decreasing toward the midline on the left, increasing on the right). Palmer's position number matches the FDI second digit in every case, which makes Palmer-to-FDI conversion the most mechanical: replace the bracket symbol with the appropriate FDI first digit, keep the position number as the FDI second digit.
Children's records use a parallel notation, and mixing it with permanent notation is a common source of error.
The deciduous dentition has its own notation in each system. In FDI, deciduous quadrants are coded 5 through 8 (5 = upper right, 6 = upper left, 7 = lower left, 8 = lower right) with position digits 1 through 5. So FDI 64 is the upper left first deciduous molar. In Universal, deciduous teeth are lettered A through T in the same clockwise order as the permanent numbers, starting at the upper right second deciduous molar (A) and ending at the lower right second deciduous molar (T). In Palmer, letters A through E replace the numbers 1 through 5.
| Deciduous tooth | FDI | Universal | Palmer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Upper right central incisor | 51 | E | A (UR bracket) |
| Upper right lateral incisor | 52 | F | B (UR bracket) |
| Upper right canine | 53 | G | C (UR bracket) |
| Upper right first molar | 54 | H | D (UR bracket) |
| Upper right second molar | 55 | A | E (UR bracket) |
| Lower left first molar | 74 | L | D (LL bracket) |
| Lower left second molar | 75 | K | E (LL bracket) |
A notation error on a form does not look like a notation error. It looks like a discrepancy between dentitions.
In routine clinical dentistry a notation error causes, at worst, a misunderstanding at the next appointment. In forensic identification it can delay a match, mislead an investigation, or cause an identification to be rejected. The reason is that comparison software and human examiners both treat a tooth number as ground truth. If the ante-mortem record says tooth 30 has a mesial amalgam restoration and the postmortem chart records tooth 46 with the same restoration, the match depends entirely on the examiner knowing that 30 and 46 are the same tooth.
The INTERPOL DVI Standing Committee requires that all dental data entered on DVI forms use FDI notation. This is not a preference. It is a procedural requirement that exists precisely because of the historical record of notation-conversion errors causing delays in mass-casualty identification. When an odontologist receives ante-mortem records from a North American source, the conversion to FDI is the first step of the comparison, done before any tooth-by-tooth comparison begins, and it is documented in the case file.
The practical skill required is not complicated. A conversion table and 10 minutes of systematic work translates any record into the working notation. The skill is recognising that the conversion is necessary, which means knowing that other systems exist and differ, which is exactly what this topic provides.
In FDI notation, what does the first digit of the tooth code represent?
Test yourself on Forensic Odontology with free, timed mocks.
Practice Forensic Odontology questionsSpotted an error in this page? Report a correction or read our editorial standards.