Skip to content

Differential Reinforcement

Definition

The balance of rewards and punishments, anticipated or actual, that follow a behaviour. If the expected rewards outweigh expected costs, the behaviour is more likely. Reinforcement can be social (peer approval, money) or non-social (the physiological effect of a drug).

Core mechanism
Balance of expected rewards versus costs
Reinforcement types
Social and non-social
Related theory
Social learning and differential association

Common questions

How does differential reinforcement predict whether a behaviour will be repeated?+

The theory holds that a behaviour becomes more likely to recur when the anticipated rewards, whether social approval, money, or a drug's physiological effect, outweigh the anticipated costs such as punishment or social disapproval, making the balance of past outcomes a predictor of future behaviour rather than the behaviour's legality alone.

What is the difference between social and non-social reinforcement in this context?+

Social reinforcement comes from other people, such as peer approval or status gained from an act, while non-social reinforcement is intrinsic to the act itself, such as the direct physiological or sensory effect of drug use, and both can independently sustain a behaviour even without the other being present.

Related terms

Definitions (Social Learning)
Attitudes or rationalisations that frame a behaviour as acceptable, justified, or necessary. In Akers's model, a high ratio of favourable-to-unfavourable definitions toward...
Differential Association
Sutherland's concept that criminal behaviour results from an excess of associations with pro-criminal definitions over anti-criminal definitions. The learning depends on the...
Imitation
Modelling one's behaviour on observed actions of others, especially admired or high-status individuals. Akers added imitation to Sutherland's original framework, explaining initial...
Pro-Criminal Definitions
Attitudes, values, or verbal rationalisations that make law-breaking seem acceptable or desirable. Examples include neutralisation techniques (denying the victim, appealing to higher...
Social Learning Theory (Akers)
The reformulation of differential association in behavioural terms by Ronald Akers and Robert Burgess (1966). It integrates differential association, definitions, differential reinforcement,...

Explained in

Your journey to becoming a forensic professional starts here.

Practice with mock tests, learn from structured notes, and get your questions answered by a global forensic community, all in one place.