Skip to content

Sexual Offences: Medicolegal Importance and Amendments

Sexual offences: BNS 2023 Sections 63-71, POCSO 2012, two-finger test ban (Lillu 2013), and post-Nirbhaya amendments.

Last updated:

Share

Sexual offences sit in Unit X of the UGC-NET Forensic Science syllabus, alongside the rest of forensic medicine and anthropology. It is one of the heaviest topics in the paper because the question can land in three different lanes. NTA might ask the bare statute (which BNS 2023 section covers gang rape, what is the cut-off age under POCSO). It might ask the medical procedure (which swabs, which kit, what consent rules apply during a sexual-assault medical examination). Or it might ask the amendment timeline (Justice Verma Committee, the 2013 Criminal Law Amendment, the 2018 Disha amendment, the Aparajita Bill 2024). You need clean recall in all three lanes.

Treat the topic as one statutory frame plus one clinical protocol plus one case-law timeline. The statutory frame is BNS 2023 Sections 63 to 71 (which carry forward IPC 375 to 376E with renumbering and modest substantive change). The clinical protocol is the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare 2014 document on Guidelines and Protocols for Medico-legal Care for Survivors and Victims of Sexual Violence, which standardised the modified Goa protocol and the SAFE kit across India. The case-law timeline runs from Lillu @ Rajesh v State of Haryana (2013) banning the two-finger test, through the post-Nirbhaya Verma Committee and the 2013 amendment, the 2018 Disha amendment after Kathua and Unnao, the 2017 Independent Thought ruling on marital rape under 18, and the 2022 State of Jharkhand v Shailendra Kumar Rai reiteration on the two-finger test. Handle the topic sensitively but factually; the NET examiner wants statute and protocol, not commentary.

Key terms
Rape (BNS 2023 Section 63)
Sexual intercourse or specified penetrative acts by a man with a woman without her consent, against her will, by coercion, by misrepresentation, or where she is under 18 or unable to give consent.
Sexual assault (POCSO)
Under POCSO 2012, any non-penetrative sexual touch of a child with sexual intent. Aggravated sexual assault attracts higher punishment when committed by a person in authority.
Penetration
Even slight penetration of the vagina, mouth, urethra or anus by the penis, any body part, or any object is sufficient to constitute the offence. Emission is not required.
Consent
Under BNS 2023 Explanation 2 to Section 63, unequivocal voluntary agreement by words, gestures or any verbal or non-verbal communication. Absence of physical resistance does not imply consent.
Two-finger test
Discredited per-vaginal examination once used to comment on habituation to intercourse. Banned by the Supreme Court in Lillu @ Rajesh v State of Haryana (2013) and reiterated in 2022.
MoH&FW protocol 2014
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Guidelines and Protocols for Medico-legal Care for Survivors and Victims of Sexual Violence, 2014. Standardised history, examination, sample collection and the SAFE kit.
POCSO 2012
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. Gender-neutral, defines child as any person under 18, mandates reporting, special courts and child-friendly procedure.
Statutory rape
Sexual intercourse with a person below the age of consent (18 in India), regardless of consent. The minor's consent is legally irrelevant.
Marital rape exception
Exception 2 to BNS 2023 Section 63 (carrying forward IPC 375 Exception 2): intercourse by a man with his own wife not under 18 is not rape. Read down to wife not under 18 by Independent Thought (2017).
Fast-track court
Designated court (often Fast Track Special Court, FTSC) set up under the 2019 scheme to dispose POCSO and rape cases within stipulated timelines.

Statutory frame: BNS 2023 Sections 63 to 71

IPC 375 to 376E carried into BNS Chapter V with renumbering.

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, in force from 1 July 2024, carries the substantive law on sexual offences in Sections 63 to 71. The structure mirrors the post-2013 IPC and you should learn both numbers; old papers cite IPC, new ones will cite BNS.

Section 63 (rape). Defines rape, replacing IPC 375. Seven descriptions cover the absence of consent (against her will, without consent, with consent obtained by putting in fear of death or hurt, with consent given under misconception that the man is her husband, with consent given when she is intoxicated or of unsound mind, when she is under 18 with or without consent, and when she is unable to communicate consent). The acts covered include penile-vaginal intercourse, insertion of any object or body part into vagina, urethra or anus, oral sex, and manipulation of any part of the body so as to cause penetration. Even slight penetration is enough. Exception 1 excludes a medical procedure or intervention; Exception 2 retains the marital rape exception for a wife not under 18.

Section 64 (punishment for rape). Rigorous imprisonment for not less than 10 years extendable to life, plus fine. Section 64(2) lists 16 aggravating circumstances (rape by police officer, public servant, member of armed forces, on a hospital inmate, on a pregnant woman, on a woman under 16, on a woman incapable of giving consent, by a relative, in custody, during communal or sectarian violence, on a woman with a mental or physical disability, causing grievous bodily harm, repeatedly on the same woman, in connivance with others) with minimum 10 years extendable to life meaning the remainder of natural life, plus fine.

Section 65 (rape on a woman under 16 / under 12). Section 65(1) covers a victim under 16: minimum 20 years extendable to remainder of natural life. Section 65(2) covers a victim under 12: minimum 20 years extendable to remainder of natural life or death. The 2018 Disha amendment introduced the death penalty for rape of a child under 12 and BNS preserves it.

Section 66 (causing death or persistent vegetative state). Where the rape causes the death of the woman or leaves her in a persistent vegetative state, minimum 20 years extendable to remainder of natural life or death. This is the section under which the Nirbhaya convicts were eventually executed in March 2020 (post-IPC 376A but the structure carried forward).

Section 67 (sexual intercourse by husband upon his wife during separation). Where a man has sexual intercourse with his own wife living separately under a decree of separation or otherwise, without her consent: imprisonment 2 to 7 years plus fine. This is one of the few situations in which a husband can be prosecuted for non-consensual sex with his wife under BNS.

Section 68 (sexual intercourse by person in authority). Public servant, superintendent or manager of jail or remand home or hospital, or someone on the management or staff of such an institution, who induces or seduces a woman in his custody to have sexual intercourse, not amounting to rape: rigorous imprisonment 5 to 10 years plus fine.

Section 69 (sexual intercourse by employing deceitful means). New section without an exact IPC parallel. Sexual intercourse by employing deceitful means or making a promise to marry a woman without intention of fulfilling it: imprisonment up to 10 years plus fine. "Deceitful means" is explained to include false promise of employment or promotion, inducement or marrying after suppressing identity.

Section 70 (gang rape). Where a woman is raped by one or more persons constituting a group or acting in furtherance of a common intention, each is deemed to have committed rape. Section 70(1): minimum 20 years extendable to remainder of natural life plus fine. Section 70(2): gang rape on a woman under 18 attracts imprisonment for remainder of natural life or death plus fine.

Section 71 (punishment for repeat offenders). Whoever, previously convicted of an offence punishable under Section 64, 65, 66 or 70, is subsequently convicted of an offence punishable under any of those sections, shall be punished with imprisonment for remainder of natural life or with death.

India anchor: the BNS 2023 sexual-offence sections were drafted to retain the post-Nirbhaya 2013 amendments and the post-Disha 2018 amendments verbatim, with only renumbering and the new Section 69. Cases registered before 1 July 2024 continue under IPC; the medical, forensic and procedural rules apply equally to both.

BNS 2023 Sections 63 to 71: offence, minimum sentence, and maximum sentence. Death penalty applies at Sections 65(2), 66, 70(
BNS 2023 Sections 63 to 71: offence, minimum sentence, and maximum sentence. Death penalty applies at Sections 65(2), 66, 70(2) and 71. Section 69 (deceitful means) is the only section with no minimum

POCSO Act 2012 and the 2019 amendment

Gender-neutral, age cut-off 18, mandatory reporting, special court.

The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act 2012 (POCSO) sits parallel to BNS where the victim is below 18. It is gender-neutral on both sides (victim and accused), which the BNS rape sections are not. NET MCQs ask the age cut-off, the four offence categories, the mandatory-reporting clause and the child-friendly trial features.

Offence categories under POCSO.

  • Section 3 (penetrative sexual assault): insertion of penis, any object or body part into the vagina, mouth, urethra or anus of a child, or manipulation causing penetration. Section 4 (punishment): minimum 20 years extendable to life, plus fine; if the child is under 16, minimum 20 years extendable to remainder of natural life.
  • Section 5 (aggravated penetrative sexual assault): when committed by a police officer, member of armed forces, public servant, staff of an institution housing the child, relative, or in cases of gang assault, repeated assault, or assault causing pregnancy or HIV transmission. Section 6 (punishment): minimum 20 years extendable to death (introduced by the 2019 amendment) plus fine.
  • Section 7 (sexual assault): non-penetrative sexual touching with sexual intent. Section 8 (punishment): 3 to 5 years plus fine.
  • Section 9 (aggravated sexual assault): the non-penetrative form with aggravating circumstances. Section 10 (punishment): 5 to 7 years plus fine.
  • Section 11 and 12 (sexual harassment): words, gestures, exhibition of objects, repeated stalking with sexual intent. Up to 3 years plus fine.
  • Section 13 to 15: use of a child for pornographic purposes and storage of child pornographic material.

Mandatory reporting (Sections 19 to 22). Any person who has apprehension that an offence under POCSO is likely to be committed, or has knowledge that one has been committed, must report it to the Special Juvenile Police Unit or local police. Failure to report by a person in charge of an institution is itself an offence (Section 21). Doctors, teachers and family members are under this duty.

Presumption (Section 29). Where a person is prosecuted under Sections 3, 5, 7 or 9, the Special Court shall presume that he has committed the offence, unless the contrary is proved. The burden shifts to the accused. Section 30 presumes culpable mental state in the same way.

Child-friendly procedure. Examination of the child as soon as possible by a woman officer not below sub-inspector, in plain clothes, in the presence of a person the child trusts (Section 24). No detention of the child in the police station overnight. Statement under BNSS Section 183 (former CrPC 164) recorded by a Magistrate, preferably a woman Magistrate. Trial in camera by a Special Court (Sessions Judge designated as Special Court, Section 28) within one year (Section 35). Identity of the child not to be disclosed (Section 23).

Medical examination (Section 27). Under POCSO, the medical examination of a child is conducted by a registered medical practitioner, and if the victim is a girl, by a woman doctor, in the presence of the parent or a person the child trusts, with informed consent of the parent or such other person. Examination is conducted as per BNSS Section 184 (former CrPC 164A), in line with the MoH&FW protocol described in Section 3 below.

POCSO 2019 amendment. Increased minimum punishment for penetrative sexual assault (Section 4) from 7 to 20 years; introduced death penalty as the maximum for aggravated penetrative sexual assault (Section 6); raised penalties for pornography-related offences.

India anchor: POCSO designates the Sessions Court in each district as the Special Court. The National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) and the State Commissions (SCPCRs) monitor implementation. The Supreme Court in Independent Thought v Union of India (2017) read down Exception 2 to IPC 375 to hold that sexual intercourse by a man with his wife under 18 is rape, harmonising IPC with POCSO.

Medicolegal examination and the MoH&FW 2014 protocol

Consent, history, general and local exam, SAFE kit, chain of custody.

Before 2014, sexual-assault medical examination in India varied widely between hospitals. The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare published the Guidelines and Protocols for Medico-legal Care for Survivors and Victims of Sexual Violence in March 2014, based on the modified Goa protocol piloted at Goa Medical College. The protocol is now the national standard and is what NET examiners expect you to recall.

Where the examination happens. Any public hospital, private hospital empanelled for medico-legal work, or designated centres like AIIMS Delhi's One-Stop Centre, JJ Hospital Mumbai, GMC Trivandrum, and the One-Stop Centres (Sakhi) set up under the Nirbhaya Fund scheme. No hospital can refuse to examine or treat a sexual-violence survivor (BNS 2023 Section 200, carrying forward IPC 166B): refusal is a punishable offence for the in-charge.

Informed consent. Consent is taken at five stages: (1) for general examination, (2) for genital examination, (3) for sample collection for forensic analysis, (4) for treatment including emergency contraception and post-exposure prophylaxis, and (5) for police information. A survivor can refuse any or all of these and treatment must still be provided. For a child under 12 or an adult unable to give consent, the parent or guardian consents; for a child between 12 and 18, the child's assent plus the parent's consent.

History taking (W and H questions). Who (assailant if known, number of assailants), what (specific acts, use of object, use of condom), where (location and surface), when (date, time, interval since assault), how (use of force, restraint, weapon, threat), and what after (bath, change of clothes, urination, douching, brushing of teeth, eating or drinking, medication). The history is recorded in the survivor's own words and forms the medical-legal certificate (MLC).

General examination. Vital signs, mental status, signs of struggle, injuries on non-genital parts (bite marks, abrasions, scratches, hold marks on arms and thighs, neck marks), state of clothing (tears, stains, foreign material). Each injury is described with site, size, shape, age, type.

Local and genital examination. Inspection of inner thighs, perineum, vulva, labia majora and minora, clitoris, urethral meatus, hymen, fourchette, fossa navicularis, vaginal walls (per-speculum where indicated and consented to), cervix, anus and perianal area. For male survivors, inspection of penis, scrotum, perineum and anus. The two-finger test is not to be performed. Comments on past sexual habituation are not to be recorded. Hymenal status is described factually (presence, type, tears: fresh or old) without inference of virginity or chastity.

Sample collection (SAFE kit). The Sexual Assault Forensic Evidence kit is the standardised pouch supplied to designated hospitals and contains pre-labelled containers for each sample. The standard set is:

  • Clothing the survivor was wearing at the time of assault, each item in a separate paper bag (not plastic, which traps moisture and degrades DNA).
  • Debris and foreign material combed or lifted from body and clothing.
  • Vaginal swabs and smears (four swabs, two smears) if vaginal assault is alleged or possible.
  • Anal swabs and smears if anal assault is alleged or within 72 hours.
  • Oral swabs and smears if oral assault is alleged or within 24 hours.
  • Buccal swab from the survivor as the reference DNA sample.
  • Dried secretions from skin (saliva, semen) lifted on a moistened swab.
  • Pubic hair combings and reference plucked hair of the survivor.
  • Fingernail clippings or scrapings from both hands.
  • Blood sample in EDTA for DNA and in plain vial for alcohol or drug screen if indicated.
  • Urine sample for drug-facilitated assault (especially benzodiazepines, GHB, ketamine).
  • Tampon or sanitary pad if in use.

Swabs are air-dried (not heat-dried), packed in paper envelopes, sealed, signed and labelled. The chain of custody runs from the examining doctor through the hospital authority to the investigating officer to the forensic science laboratory; any break is fatal in court. Refer to the dedicated note on chain of custody for the documentation discipline.

Time windows for sample collection. Vaginal swabs are useful up to 96 hours (some labs extend to 7 days); anal up to 72 hours; oral up to 24 hours; skin swabs for dried secretions up to 7 days if not washed; clothing useful for weeks if preserved. Beyond these windows the medical examination is still conducted for injury documentation, treatment and counselling.

Treatment after examination. Emergency contraception (levonorgestrel within 72 hours), post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for HIV within 72 hours, prophylaxis for sexually transmitted infections, tetanus toxoid where indicated, wound care, psychological first aid and referral. Pregnancy testing and counselling on lawful medical termination of pregnancy under the MTP Act.

India anchor: the MoH&FW 2014 protocol is supplemented in many states by their own State Health Department circulars. The Sakhi One-Stop Centres under the Ministry of Women and Child Development integrate medical, legal, police and counselling services under one roof. Forensic samples are sent to the State Forensic Science Laboratory or to CFSL Chandigarh and CFSL Hyderabad DNA divisions for STR profiling and Y-STR analysis.

The two-finger test and its judicial ban

Lillu 2013 banned it. Shailendra Kumar Rai 2022 made non-compliance professional misconduct.

For decades, the per-vaginal two-finger test (PV test) was recorded in medico-legal certificates to comment on whether the hymen admitted one finger, two fingers, or more, and whether the survivor was "habituated to sexual intercourse". The test has no diagnostic value for sexual assault; it is invasive, humiliating, and violates the survivor's dignity. International human-rights bodies have repeatedly condemned it.

Lillu @ Rajesh v State of Haryana (2013, Supreme Court). A two-judge bench (Justices B S Chauhan and F M I Kalifulla) held that the two-finger test on a rape survivor violates her right to privacy, dignity and bodily integrity under Article 21. The previous sexual experience of the survivor is irrelevant to the determination of whether she was raped. The court directed the Union and state governments to implement the MoH&FW guidelines and to ensure that the test is not conducted.

State of Jharkhand v Shailendra Kumar Rai (2022, Supreme Court). The court (Justices D Y Chandrachud and Hima Kohli) reiterated the Lillu ban, expressed dismay that the test continued in some hospitals, and directed that any person who conducts the two-finger test on a survivor of sexual assault be held guilty of professional misconduct. The court directed the Union and state governments to review medical curricula to remove the test and to incorporate the MoH&FW protocol.

For NET, fix three points: the test is banned, the leading authority is Lillu 2013, and the reiteration plus professional-misconduct ruling is Shailendra Kumar Rai 2022. The medico-legal certificate must not contain comments on past sexual habituation, virginity, or "loose vagina".

India anchor: the National Medical Commission has updated MBBS forensic-medicine teaching to align with the Lillu and Shailendra Kumar Rai rulings. State medical boards are empowered to act on professional misconduct under the National Medical Commission Act 2019 read with the Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations 2002.

Amendment history: 2013 (Nirbhaya), 2018 (Disha), 2024 (Aparajita)

Justice Verma Committee gave the template, the rest is iteration.

The amendment timeline is itself a question. Learn the trigger event, the committee or report, the year of the Act, and the substantive change.

Criminal Law (Amendment) Act 2013 ("Nirbhaya Act"). Trigger: the 16 December 2012 Delhi bus gang rape (Jyoti Singh, "Nirbhaya"). The government constituted the Justice J S Verma Committee (with Justice Leila Seth and Gopal Subramanium), which submitted its report on 23 January 2013. The Verma report led to the 2013 amendment. Substantive changes:

  • Expanded the definition of rape in IPC 375 from peno-vaginal intercourse to include insertion of objects, body parts, oral sex and manipulation causing penetration.
  • Added IPC 376A (rape causing death or persistent vegetative state, minimum 20 years extendable to remainder of life or death), now BNS 66.
  • Added IPC 376D (gang rape, minimum 20 years extendable to remainder of life), now BNS 70.
  • Added IPC 376E (repeat offender, life or death), now BNS 71.
  • Added IPC 354A (sexual harassment), 354B (assault to disrobe), 354C (voyeurism), 354D (stalking), carried forward into BNS 75 to 78.
  • Added IPC 326A and 326B (acid attack), now BNS 124.
  • Added IPC 166A and 166B (police refusing to register FIR; hospital refusing treatment), now BNS 199 and 200.
  • Lowered the medical examination procedure under CrPC 164A (now BNSS 184) and recording of survivor statement under CrPC 164 (now BNSS 183).
  • Set up the Nirbhaya Fund of Rs 1,000 crore (Union Budget 2013-14) to finance survivor support.

Criminal Law (Amendment) Act 2018 ("Disha" frame). Triggers: the January 2018 Kathua case (8-year-old Bakerwal girl in Jammu) and the Unnao case (Uttar Pradesh). Substantive changes:

  • Introduced minimum 20 years for rape of a woman under 16 (IPC 376(3), now BNS 65(1)).
  • Introduced death penalty for rape of a woman under 12 (IPC 376AB, now BNS 65(2)).
  • Introduced minimum 20 years for gang rape of a woman under 16 (IPC 376DA) and death penalty for gang rape of a woman under 12 (IPC 376DB), now BNS 70(2).
  • Mandated investigation in rape cases to be completed within 2 months and trial within 2 months.
  • Provided for setting up of Fast Track Special Courts (FTSCs) for POCSO and rape cases (the Union scheme was approved in 2019; over 1,000 FTSCs sanctioned).

Telangana Disha Act 2019. State-level law (Andhra Pradesh Disha Act 2019 is the parallel in AP). Provides for investigation within 7 working days and trial within 14 working days for cases involving "adequate conclusive evidence", and capital punishment for rape and gang rape. Pending presidential assent at the time of writing; not yet in force.

Aparajita Woman and Child (West Bengal Criminal Laws Amendment) Bill 2024. Passed by the West Bengal Legislative Assembly in September 2024 after the R G Kar Medical College trainee doctor case. Proposes the death penalty for rape and life imprisonment without remission for several aggravated forms; provides for time-bound investigation (21 days, extendable to 36) and trial (30 days). State amendment to BNS and BNSS; awaits Presidential assent.

POCSO (Amendment) Act 2019. Already covered in Section 2 above: raised minimum punishments and added death penalty for aggravated penetrative sexual assault on a child.

Independent Thought v Union of India (2017). The Supreme Court read down Exception 2 to IPC 375 to exclude wives under 18, harmonising the marital-rape exception with POCSO and the age of consent. The wider question of marital rape of an adult wife remains pending before the Supreme Court in a batch of petitions led by the RIT Foundation case.

India anchor: the Justice Verma Committee report (January 2013) remains the most cited single document on Indian sexual-offence law reform; for NET, remember its date and its three principal recommendations (expanded rape definition, separate offences for acid attack and stalking, and recognition of the right of every woman to live free of sexual violence as a constitutional entitlement).

Evidence and procedure: BSA 2023, BNSS 2023

Section 53A presumption, Section 114A presumption of no consent, BNSS 183 magistrate statement.

The evidentiary and procedural rules are the third leg of the topic. The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 carried forward the Indian Evidence Act provisions with renumbering, and the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 carried forward the CrPC procedure.

BSA 2023 Section 26 (former IEA 53A). In a prosecution for rape or attempted rape, evidence of the character of the victim or her previous sexual experience with any person is not relevant on the issue of consent or quality of consent. This shuts down the "she was promiscuous" defence line.

BSA 2023 Section 27 (former IEA 54). In criminal proceedings the fact that the accused has a bad character is not relevant, unless evidence has been given that he has a good character. Carved out for sexual offences by the surrounding sections.

BSA 2023 Section 39 (former IEA 45). Expert opinion. When the court has to form an opinion upon a point of foreign law, science, art, identity of handwriting or finger impressions, the opinions of persons specially skilled is a relevant fact. The medical officer and DNA analyst testify under this section. Sample handling and admissibility flow through the BSA 2023 framework for forensic evidence in court.

BSA 2023 Section 120 (former IEA 114A). Presumption as to absence of consent. In a prosecution under BNS 2023 Section 64(2) clauses (a) to (n) (the aggravated forms of rape) where sexual intercourse is proved and the woman states in her evidence before the court that she did not consent, the court shall presume that she did not consent. This is a rebuttable presumption that shifts the burden to the accused.

BNSS 2023 Section 183 (former CrPC 164). Recording of confessions and statements by a Magistrate. The statement of a sexual-assault survivor may be recorded by a Judicial Magistrate, preferably a woman Magistrate, at the survivor's residence or a place of her choice, in the presence of a person she trusts, with the use of audio-video means encouraged. The statement is admissible at trial and reduces the trauma of repeated narration. For a child survivor under POCSO, this recording is mandatory and is treated as the examination-in-chief.

BNSS 2023 Section 184 (former CrPC 164A). Medical examination of the victim of rape. To be conducted by a registered medical practitioner in a government or local-authority-run hospital, or in the absence of such, any other registered practitioner, with the consent of the woman or her guardian, within 24 hours of receipt of information about the offence. The report is to be forwarded to the investigating officer without delay.

BNSS 2023 Section 193 and 348 (former CrPC 173 and 311A). Section 193 governs the investigation report and timelines; Section 348 carries forward the power of a Magistrate to direct an accused to give specimens of his handwriting, signature, finger impressions, voice sample and so on. This is the procedural vehicle for ordering a buccal swab or hair sample from the accused for DNA comparison.

BNSS 2023 Section 175 (former CrPC 156). Police officer's power to investigate cognisable offences. All BNS sections 63 to 71 are cognisable, non-bailable and triable by a Court of Session.

India anchor: the BNS, BNSS and BSA 2023 came into force on 1 July 2024. Reading material for the procedural side is in the dedicated note on the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and investigation. For DNA, the DNA structure, extraction and profiling techniques note covers what the FSL does with the swabs once they arrive; the body fluids note covers serological confirmation of semen, saliva and blood that underpin the chain from swab to STR profile.

Which BNS 2023 sections cover sexual offences and how do they map to the old IPC?
BNS 2023 Sections 63 to 71 cover rape and related offences. Section 63 (rape, replaces IPC 375), 64 (punishment, replaces 376), 65 (minor under 16 and under 12, replaces 376(3) and 376AB), 66 (causing death or persistent vegetative state, replaces 376A), 67 (separated wife, replaces 376B), 68 (person in authority, replaces 376C), 69 (deceitful means or false promise of marriage, new with no exact IPC parallel), 70 (gang rape, replaces 376D and 376DA / DB), 71 (repeat offender, replaces 376E). Substantive content of the post-2013 IPC carries forward almost verbatim.
What is the age of consent under Indian law and why does POCSO matter?
The age of consent in India is 18, raised from 16 by the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act 2013. Any sexual act with a person under 18 is statutory rape regardless of consent. POCSO 2012 sits alongside BNS for under-18 victims and is gender-neutral on both sides. It defines penetrative sexual assault (Section 3), aggravated penetrative sexual assault (Section 5, death penalty after 2019 amendment), sexual assault (Section 7), and sexual harassment (Section 11), with a special-court structure, mandatory reporting (Section 19) and a statutory presumption against the accused (Section 29).
Is the two-finger test still used in India? Which case banned it?
No, the two-finger test is banned. The Supreme Court in Lillu @ Rajesh v State of Haryana (2013) held that the test violates the right to privacy, dignity and bodily integrity under Article 21, and that the previous sexual experience of a survivor is irrelevant to whether she was raped. The court reiterated this in State of Jharkhand v Shailendra Kumar Rai (2022) and directed that any medical practitioner who conducts the test be held guilty of professional misconduct. The MoH&FW 2014 protocol explicitly prohibits the test and comments on past sexual habituation.
What is the standard sexual-assault medical examination protocol in India?
The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare 2014 Guidelines and Protocols for Medico-legal Care for Survivors and Victims of Sexual Violence is the national standard. It mandates examination at any public hospital with informed consent taken at five stages (general examination, genital examination, sample collection, treatment, police information). The doctor takes history using W and H questions, conducts general and local examination without the two-finger test, collects samples in the SAFE kit (clothing, vaginal, anal, oral swabs and smears, buccal reference swab, dried secretions, hair combings, fingernail scrapings, blood, urine), and provides emergency contraception, HIV post-exposure prophylaxis and STI prophylaxis. Swabs are air-dried, packed in paper, sealed, and handed to the investigating officer with chain-of-custody documentation.
What did the Justice Verma Committee recommend and which Act followed?
The Justice J S Verma Committee was constituted after the December 2012 Delhi gang rape and submitted its report on 23 January 2013. It recommended an expanded definition of rape beyond peno-vaginal intercourse, separate offences for acid attack, stalking, voyeurism and disrobing, and the recognition of sexual violence as a violation of constitutional rights. The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act 2013 followed, expanding IPC 375 and adding IPC 326A, 326B, 354A to 354D, 376A, 376D and 376E. Most of these provisions are now carried forward into BNS 2023 Sections 63 to 78 and 124.

Test yourself on UGC-NET Forensic Science with free, timed mocks.

Practice UGC-NET Forensic Science questions

Found this useful? Pass it along.

Share

Spotted an error in this page? Report a correction or read our editorial standards.

Your journey to becoming a forensic professional starts here.

Practice with mock tests, learn from structured notes, and get your questions answered by a global forensic community, all in one place.