Inorganic Poison Analysis: AAS, ICP-OES, ICP-MS and Ion Chromatography
How toxic metals and anions are quantitated after wet digestion: flame and graphite-furnace AAS, ICP-OES and ICP-MS for multi-element panels, and ion chromatography for anions like fluoride, chloride and oxalate, with detection limits matched to Indian medico-legal cut-offs.
Last updated:
Inorganic poisons such as lead, arsenic, mercury, thallium and cadmium carry no parent peak or fragmentation pattern, so analysts must isolate and quantify the element itself, often at microgram-per-litre concentrations or lower. Four technique families address this: atomic absorption spectroscopy in flame, graphite-furnace, cold-vapour and hydride-generation modes; ICP-OES for multi-element panels at ppb; ICP-MS for ppt detection and isotope-ratio source attribution; and ion chromatography for anions such as oxalate, fluoride and cyanide that atomic techniques cannot detect. Instrument selection depends on the expected concentration range, the matrix, and whether the forensic question concerns a metal or a counter-ion, not on detection-limit specifications alone.
Metal poisons present a problem that organic poisons do not. Lead, arsenic, mercury, thallium and cadmium have no parent peak and no fragmentation pattern, only an element and a concentration. The analyst must isolate that element from a complex biological digest, often at microgram-per-litre concentrations or below.
Key takeaways
- Unlike organic drugs, metals such as lead, arsenic and mercury have no parent peak or fragmentation pattern, so the analyst must isolate the element itself, often at micrograms per litre or lower.
- Atomic absorption runs in four modes (flame, graphite furnace, cold vapour, hydride generation) and is the workhorse of older state SFSLs, while ICP-OES adds many elements at once and ICP-MS reaches far lower levels.
- ICP-MS can tell methylmercury from inorganic mercury by reading isotope ratios, which routine atomic methods cannot.
- Ion chromatography catches anions the atomic techniques miss, such as oxalate from ethylene glycol and fluoride in chronic fluorosis.
- Detection limit alone does not pick the instrument: a low-level method is useless if digestion lost the analyte, and a simpler method can still convict in an acute high-dose case.
Four technique families carry the inorganic forensic load in India. Atomic absorption spectroscopy, in flame, graphite-furnace, cold-vapour and hydride-generation variants, is the workhorse of older state SFSLs. ICP-OES brings multi-element capability at ppb. ICP-MS runs the modern NABL-accredited panel at ppt and reads isotope ratios that distinguish methylmercury from inorganic mercury. Ion chromatography handles anions the atomic techniques cannot see: oxalate from ethylene glycol, fluoride from chronic fluorosis.
Detection limit alone does not determine instrument choice. ICP-MS at ppt is ineffective if wet digestion has lost half the analyte to volatilisation, and flame AAS at ppm is adequate for an acute high-dose case. The toxicologist selects the technique based on the question, the expected concentration range and the matrix.
By the end of this topic you will be able to:
- Explain the Beer-Lambert basis of atomic absorption and describe how each of the four AAS modes (flame, GFAAS, CVAAS, HG-AAS) achieves atomisation and the concentration regime each covers.
- Compare ICP-OES and ICP-MS on detection limit, element coverage and isotope-ratio capability, and identify cases where one is preferred over the other.
- Describe how ion chromatography is used to detect and quantitate forensically significant anions including oxalate, fluoride, nitrite and cyanide.
- Apply published action levels (WHO, BIS, ICMR, Indian Factories Act) to interpret a blood, urine or hair metal result in a medico-legal context.
- Specify the quality-control elements required in a court-ready inorganic toxicology report: blanks, CRMs, spike recovery, duplicates, uncertainty and matrix documentation.
- AAS
- Atomic absorption spectroscopy. Ground-state atoms in a vapour absorb characteristic wavelengths from a hollow-cathode lamp; absorbance is proportional to concentration by Beer-Lambert.
- GFAAS
- Graphite-furnace AAS. A graphite tube electrothermally heated to 2700°C atomises a microlitre aliquot, giving ppb detection for As, Pb, Cd and Hg in biological matrices.
- ICP-OES
- Inductively coupled plasma optical emission. An argon plasma at 6000 to 10000 K excites atoms which emit characteristic wavelengths, giving a multi-element panel at ppb in one run.
- ICP-MS
- Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. The plasma ionises the analyte and a quadrupole or sector MS separates ions by m/z, giving ppt detection and isotope-ratio capability.
- Ion chromatography
- Ion-exchange separation with conductivity detection after a suppressor, used to quantitate inorganic anions and cations such as fluoride, oxalate, sodium and calcium.
- CRM
- Certified reference material. A matrix-matched material of known composition (NIST SRM 955c lead in caprine blood, SRM 1577c bovine liver) used to verify accuracy in every batch.
Atomic absorption spectroscopy and its four working modes
Atomic absorption rests on a single idea. Free ground-state atoms in the light path of a hollow-cathode lamp emitting the same element's characteristic line absorb a fraction of the light proportional to their number, and Beer-Lambert converts the reading into a concentration. What changes between the four modes is the way the sample is persuaded to give up its atoms.
Flame AAS uses a burner fed with fuel and oxidant. Air-acetylene at about 2300°C atomises lead at 283.3 nm, copper at 324.7 nm, zinc at 213.9 nm, cadmium at 228.8 nm. Refractory elements need nitrous oxide-acetylene at about 2800°C (aluminium, chromium, vanadium). Flame AAS sits at ppm and is the proportionate tool for acute high-dose cases.
Graphite-furnace AAS swaps the flame for a graphite tube. A microlitre aliquot is pipetted in, the tube is heated through a programmed ramp (drying 110°C, ashing 400 to 1200°C, atomisation up to 2700°C), and the atomic vapour sits in the light path long enough for the reading. Detection drops to ppb, the regime needed for As, Pb, Cd and Hg in routine blood and urine.
Cold-vapour AAS is the mercury-specific mode. Mercury is the only metal with a measurable vapour pressure at room temperature. Stannous chloride reduces mercuric ion to elemental mercury, the vapour is swept into a quartz cell, and absorbance is read at 253.7 nm.
Hydride-generation AAS exploits the hydride chemistry of As, Sb, Se, Bi and Sn. Sodium borohydride in acid reduces the metal ion to its volatile hydride (arsine AsH3, stibine SbH3), swept by argon into a heated quartz cell at about 900°C where it dissociates to free atoms.
| Mode | Atomisation | Typical target elements | Working LOD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flame AAS (air-acetylene) | Flame at about 2300°C | Pb, Cu, Zn, Cd, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn | µg/mL (ppm) |
| Flame AAS (N2O-acetylene) | Flame at about 2800°C | Al, Cr, V, Mo, Si, Ti, Ba | µg/mL (ppm) |
| GFAAS | Electrothermal up to 2700°C | As, Pb, Cd, Hg, Cr, Ni, Tl, Se | ng/mL (ppb) |
| CVAAS | SnCl2 reduction, room-temp vapour at 253.7 nm | Hg specifically | ng/mL (ppb) |
| HG-AAS | NaBH4 hydride into quartz cell at 900°C | As, Sb, Se, Bi, Te, Sn | ng/mL (ppb) |
ICP-OES and the multi-element panel

ICP-OES replaces single-element sequential AAS with multi-element parallel analysis. A radio-frequency field couples to an argon stream in a quartz torch, heating the gas to a partially ionised plasma at 6000 to 10000 K, hot enough to atomise any element. Excited atoms emit characteristic wavelengths and a polychromator reads all wavelengths simultaneously.
The standard inorganic forensic panel (Pb, As, Cd, Hg, Cu, Zn, Cr, Ni, Co, Mn, Fe, Al) runs in one injection at ppb, comparable to GFAAS but with simultaneous readout. Mercury is the weak link because of a poor optical emission line, and is usually still done by CVAAS or ICP-MS. ICP-OES is the natural fit for open-question cases: industrial pollution, chronic occupational exposure, Wilson disease versus copper poisoning, environmental groundwater screening. NABL-accredited FSLs at Madhuban, Mahabaleshwar, Kalina and Mohali run ICP-OES or ICP-MS as the routine panel.
ICP-MS, isotope ratios and the modern Indian bench
ICP-MS uses the same argon plasma as ICP-OES but replaces the optical detector with a mass spectrometer. Ions are extracted through a sampling cone, separated by quadrupole or sector field according to m/z, and counted by an electron multiplier. Detection drops to ppt, three to four orders below ICP-OES, and the instrument delivers what no AAS or ICP-OES can: isotope ratios.
Isotope ratios matter for two recurring questions. First, source attribution for lead: industrial and ore-source lead carries characteristic ²⁰⁸Pb to ²⁰⁶Pb and ²⁰⁷Pb to ²⁰⁶Pb signatures, so a blood lead in a child can be tied back to a specific paint, solder or battery-scrap stream. Second, methylmercury versus inorganic mercury, where the ²⁰²Hg to ²⁰⁰Hg ratio with HPLC-ICP-MS tells the toxicologist whether a fish-eating cohort case is organic mercury from methylated fish or inorganic from dental amalgam or industry.
Interference is the practical challenge. The argon plasma creates polyatomic ions that mimic analyte masses. The classical interferent is ⁴⁰Ar¹⁶O at m/z 56 sitting on ⁵⁶Fe. Modern collision-reaction cells use helium or hydrogen to break up the polyatomic without affecting the monoatomic analyte. The Agilent 7700 at CFSL Chandigarh, the PerkinElmer NexION at CFSL Hyderabad and the Thermo iCAP RQ at several state SFSLs run collision-cell technology as standard.
| Element | Flame AAS | GFAAS / CVAAS / HG-AAS | ICP-OES | ICP-MS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead (Pb) | 0.1 µg/mL | 0.5 ng/mL (GFAAS) | 1 µg/L | 0.001 µg/L |
| Arsenic (As) | 0.5 µg/mL | 0.1 ng/mL (HG-AAS) | 2 µg/L | 0.005 µg/L |
| Mercury (Hg) | Not practical | 0.05 ng/mL (CVAAS) | 5 µg/L | 0.002 µg/L |
| Cadmium (Cd) | 0.01 µg/mL | 0.05 ng/mL (GFAAS) | 0.5 µg/L | 0.001 µg/L |
| Thallium (Tl) | 0.5 µg/mL | 0.5 ng/mL (GFAAS) | 5 µg/L | 0.001 µg/L |
| Copper (Cu) | 0.05 µg/mL | 0.5 ng/mL (GFAAS) | 0.4 µg/L | 0.002 µg/L |

Ion chromatography for the anions the atomic techniques cannot see

AAS and ICP see the metal, not the counter-ion. A case driven by an anion (ethylene glycol metabolised to oxalate, fluoride in fluorosis water, sodium fluoroacetate in a rodenticide) needs a different instrument. Ion chromatography fills that gap.
The principle is ion exchange. A quaternary ammonium column retains anions, a sulfonate column retains cations. A continuous eluent (sodium carbonate or bicarbonate for anions, methanesulfonic acid for cations) flows through, sample ions elute at characteristic retention times and pass through a suppressor that reduces the eluent background before the conductivity detector reads each peak.
The anions of forensic interest are fluoride (chronic fluorosis from the Nalgonda and Anantapur belts, acute HF spills), chloride, sulphate, nitrate and nitrite (methaemoglobinaemia workup), phosphate, cyanide and most importantly oxalate. Oxalate is the metabolite of ethylene glycol, which turns up regularly in Indian urban poisoning either as accidental ingestion or as a homicidal vehicle. Urinary oxalate well above the physiological 10 to 40 mg per 24 hours, with calcium oxalate crystals on microscopy and a high anion-gap acidosis, locks the diagnosis without needing the parent on GC. Cations (Na, K, NH4, Ca, Mg) are used for electrolyte profiling in mass-poisoning incidents with adulterated milk, water or food.
- 1. Wet digestion of the biological matrixAbout 1 g of liver, kidney or whole blood is digested in concentrated nitric acid with hydrogen peroxide in a microwave-assisted closed vessel at 180 to 200°C for 15 to 30 minutes, giving a clear aqueous digest.
- 2. Calibration setupExternal calibration with NIST-traceable standards for clean digests, standard addition for matrix-heavy samples. A method blank, reagent blank and at least one CRM (SRM 955c for blood lead, SRM 1577c bovine liver for As, Pb, Hg, Cd) run with every batch.
- 3. Instrument analysisFlame AAS for ppm acute cases, GFAAS for ppb biological matrix, CVAAS for mercury, HG-AAS for arsenic and antimony, ICP-OES for multi-element panels at ppb, ICP-MS for ppt and isotope ratios. Ion chromatography in parallel for anions.
- 4. QC and reportingDuplicates on at least 10 percent of samples, spike recovery at 80 to 120 percent, CRM result within certificate uncertainty. The report carries matrix, method, LOD, LOQ, result with uncertainty, CRM value and the relevant medico-legal cut-off.
Indian medico-legal cut-offs and what the numbers mean
A toxicology report is useful only when the analyst can place the numerical result on a clinical and legal scale. Indian SFSL practice uses cut-offs drawn from WHO, BIS and ICMR guidance.
Blood lead is the most frequently cited number. WHO holds there is no safe threshold, but operational cut-offs are 5 µg/dL as a paediatric screening trigger, 10 µg/dL as intervention level (used at AIIMS Delhi and PGI Chandigarh), and 40 µg/dL as adult occupational action under Factories Act guidance for battery, smelter and lead-paint workers. 80 µg/dL is acute encephalopathy territory.
Hair arsenic above 1 ppm is chronic exposure. Urine arsenic above 50 µg per 24 hours flags recent exposure. WHO caps drinking-water arsenic at 10 ppb while BIS IS 10500 permits 50 ppb without an alternate source, the gap that drives the West Bengal, Bihar, Assam and Jharkhand arsenicosis work and the WBHIDCO groundwater programme. Urine mercury above 50 µg/L suggests organic mercury exposure. Thallium has no normal physiological level and any detection is presumptively poisoning.
| Metal | Matrix | Action level | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lead (Pb) | Blood (paediatric) | >5 µg/dL screen, >10 µg/dL intervention | WHO, ICMR |
| Lead (Pb) | Blood (adult occupational) | >40 µg/dL | Indian Factories Act |
| Arsenic (As) | Hair | >1 ppm chronic | SFSL practice |
| Arsenic (As) | Drinking water | WHO 10 ppb, BIS IS 10500 50 ppb | WHO, BIS |
| Mercury (Hg) | Urine | >50 µg/L organic exposure | WHO biological monitoring |
| Cadmium (Cd) | Blood | >5 µg/L non-smoker | WHO biological monitoring |
| Thallium (Tl) | Blood or urine | Any detection significant | Indian SFSL practice |
Quality control and the Indian NABL framework
NABL accreditation under ISO/IEC 17025 sets the quality baseline at most modern Indian FSLs. Every batch runs with a method blank, a reagent blank, at least one CRM (SRM 955c blood lead, SRM 1577c bovine liver, SRM 2670a urine), duplicates on at least 10 percent of samples, and a spike-recovery check.
Calibration follows the matrix. A clean aqueous digest is quantitated against external calibration with NIST-traceable standards. A matrix-heavy digest (urine, incompletely digested viscera) uses standard addition: the digest is spiked at increasing concentrations, the calibration line is built within the matrix itself, and the concentration is read from the negative x-intercept.
CFSL Chandigarh runs an Agilent 7700 ICP-MS as the trace-metal workhorse. FSL Madhuban runs a flame plus GFAAS battery alongside an ICP-MS. PHED (Public Health Engineering Department, Government of West Bengal) uses ICP-MS for West Bengal groundwater arsenic mapping. AIIMS Delhi handles occupational lead from battery and smelter workers via GFAAS with ICP-MS for source attribution. PGI Chandigarh runs the Wilson versus copper sulphate workup, where the differential matters: copper sulphate is a homicidal and suicidal vehicle in north India while Wilson is a treatable genetic disease.
Which AAS mode is the standard for elemental mercury quantitation in biological matrices?
Frequently asked questions
When should the bench prefer GFAAS over flame AAS?
What is the practical difference between ICP-OES and ICP-MS?
Why does mercury need a different AAS mode?
What does standard addition do that external calibration does not?
Why does Indian drinking water carry two arsenic limits?
How does the bench distinguish homicidal copper sulphate from a Wilson disease crisis?
Is ion chromatography ever a stand-alone diagnostic technique?
Test yourself on Forensic Toxicology with free, timed mocks.
Practice Forensic Toxicology questionsSpotted an error in this page? Report a correction or read our editorial standards.