Questioned Document: Handwriting Standard Samples and BSA 39 Admissibility
Published:
Questions
30
Duration
30 min
Faculty-reviewed
0
Updated
26 May 2026
Practice with national-level exam (FACT, FACT Plus, NET, CUET, etc.) mocks, learn from structured notes, and get your doubts solved in one place.
Published:
Questions
30
Duration
30 min
Faculty-reviewed
0
Updated
26 May 2026
This UGC-NET Paper II Unit IX drill covers the two pillars of handwriting comparison in Indian courts: the collection of adequate standard samples and the legal framework that determines when a handwriting expert''s opinion is admissible. Request writings (specimen writings) are samples taken before the examiner under controlled dictation, requiring multiple sessions, varied instruments, and spontaneous conditions to prevent deliberate disguise. Collected writings (course-of-business writings) include signed cheques, application forms, bank mandates, and personal letters whose authenticity is established by independent evidence rather than the examination itself. ASTM E2290 defines the handwriting features examined in comparison: letter forms, pen lifts, proportions, connecting strokes, baseline habits, shading, and beginning and ending strokes. Section 39 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) 2023 (formerly Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872) governs the general admissibility of expert opinion, while Section 39 BSA (the dedicated handwriting provision, formerly IEA Section 45) and the special provision now numbered Section 39 BSA cover handwriting experts. The former IEA Section 45 expert-opinion framework is now Section 39 BSA 2023. The specific handwriting-comparison admissibility rule formerly at IEA Section 47 is now at BSA Section 39 as well, and the dedicated provision for comparison of disputed writing with admitted writing is at BSA Section 73 (formerly IEA Section 73). BNSS Section 349 (formerly CrPC Section 311A) gives a magistrate power to direct any person to give a specimen of their handwriting for comparison, distinct from the compelled discovery addressed by IEA Section 27 (now BSA Section 23).
Aimed at UGC-NET Forensic Science Paper II aspirants working through Unit IX (Questioned Documents), NFSU MSc Forensic Science students, FACT aptitude candidates, and document examiners at GEQD Shimla and CFSL Kolkata preparing for expert-witness depositions.
Topics covered:
Allow 30 minutes.
Questions are written and edited by the ForensicSpot team and cited from peer-reviewed forensic textbooks, official syllabi and primary case law. Each one is verified before publishing. Detailed explanations show after you submit, so the test stays a real test. See a mistake? Tell us.