Skip to content
NETmedium Premium

Physical Evidence and Chain of Custody: Method and Application (UGC-NET Unit I)

Published:

Questions

30

Duration

30 min

Faculty-reviewed

0

Updated

17 May 2026

Score, per-question explanations and topic breakdown shown right after you submit.

About this mock

UGC-NET Forensic Science Unit I drill on physical-evidence handling at the method-application band. Each scenario requires choosing the correct packaging, collection sequence, statutory authority, or admissibility ruling, covering paper bindle versus antistatic versus Faraday versus heat-sealed nylon, BSA Section 63 and BNSS Section 103, Anvar v. Basheer 2014, Arjun Panditrao 2020, hash-based integrity, panchnama drafting, and exhibit-room storage. Companion to the easy band on the same syllabus area.

Sources & references

Questions in this mock are written and verified against the following sources. Citations are recorded per question and shown in the explanation after submission.

  • BPRD, Crime Scene Management Manual

    Chapter on Documentation Sequence and Photography

    Open source
    cited in 5 questions
  • Robertson, Roux, Wiggins, Forensic Examination of Fibres

    CRC Press, 3rd Edition, Chapter on Recovery Methods for Large Surfaces

    cited in 2 questions
  • Saferstein, Richard, Criminalistics: An Introduction to Forensic Science

    Pearson, 12th Edition, Chapter on Paint Analysis and Vehicle Identification

    cited in 2 questions
  • Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023, Section 63

    Admissibility of electronic records

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • CFSL Operations Manual, Exhibit Receipt Procedure

    Handling of Damaged or Broken Seals on Arrival

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • FBI Quality Assurance Standards for Forensic DNA Testing Laboratories

    Section on Evidence Storage and Preservation

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • DGHS, Medico-Legal Manual of Government of India

    Chapter on Collection and Preservation of Viscera for Toxicological Analysis

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • NIST SP 800-86, Guide to Integrating Forensic Techniques into Incident Response

    Section on Integrity Verification of Forensic Images

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • Society of Forensic Toxicologists / American Academy of Forensic Sciences, Forensic Toxicology Laboratory Guidelines

    Specimen Collection, Preservation and Transport

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, Section 103

    Persons in charge of closed places to allow search

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • SWGSTAIN, Scientific Working Group on Bloodstain Pattern Analysis

    Recommended Practices for Bloodstain Pattern Analysis

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • AFTE, Theory of Identification as it Relates to Toolmarks

    AFTE Journal, Volume 30, Number 1

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, Section 94

    Summons to produce document or other thing

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • Sweet, Lorente, Lorente, Valenzuela, Villanueva (1997), Journal of Forensic Sciences

    An Improved Method to Recover Saliva from Human Skin: The Double Swab Technique

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • ASTM International, Standard Practice E1492-11

    Receiving, Documenting, Storing, and Retrieving Evidence in a Forensic Science Laboratory

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer (2014) 10 SCC 473

    Supreme Court of India, Three-judge bench

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • SWGDE, Best Practices for Examining Mobile Phones Using JTAG and Chip-Off

    Static Protection of Loose Components

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • NIST SP 800-101 Revision 1

    Guidelines on Mobile Device Forensics

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, Sections 103 and 105

    Search procedure and seizure memo

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal (2020) 7 SCC 1

    Supreme Court of India, Three-judge bench

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • CFSL Biology Division, Standard Operating Procedure for Biological Stain Recovery

    Cuttings and Substrate Controls for Absorbent Materials

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • ISO/IEC 17025, General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories

    Crime Scene Examination Requirements

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • CFSL Biology Division, Standard Operating Procedure for Wet Biological Exhibits

    Drying, Folding, and Paper Packaging of Stained Textiles

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • ENFSI Expert Working Group on Firearms / GSR

    Best Practice Manual for Chemographic Methods in Gunshot Residue Analysis

    Open source
    cited in 1 question

How our mocks are built

Questions are written and edited by the ForensicSpot team and cited from peer-reviewed forensic textbooks, official syllabi and primary case law. Each one is verified before publishing. Detailed explanations show after you submit, so the test stays a real test. See a mistake? Tell us.

Common questions

What does the Physical Evidence and Chain of Custody: Method and Application (UGC-NET Unit I) mock cover?+

UGC-NET Forensic Science Unit I drill on physical-evidence handling at the method-application band. Each scenario requires choosing the correct packaging, collection sequence, statutory authority, or admissibility ruling, covering paper bindle versus antistatic versus Faraday versus heat-sealed nylon, BSA Section 63 and BNSS Section 103, Anvar v. Basheer 2014, Arjun Panditrao 2020, hash-based integrity, panchnama drafting, and exhibit-room storage. Companion to the easy band on the same syllabus

How many questions and how long is the test?+

30 multiple-choice questions, 30 minutes total. Difficulty: medium. Tier: Premium.

Who is this mock for?+

Forensic science students and aspirants who want timed, exam-style practice with explanations and verified source citations on NET. Useful for postgraduate entrance preparation and for BSc / MSc forensic students testing their recall under time.

Are the questions reviewed?+

Each question carries a verified source citation. Faculty review for individual questions is in progress.

Do I need an account to take this mock?+

Yes, a free ForensicSpot account is required to start a timed attempt — this lets you save progress, see per-question explanations after submission, and track your topic-level performance over time.

Your journey to becoming a forensic professional starts here.

Practice with mock tests, learn from structured notes, and get your questions answered by a global forensic community, all in one place.