Multimedia Forensics: Biometric Presentation Attack Detection and Spoofing
Published:
Questions
26
Duration
30 min
Faculty-reviewed
0
Updated
26 May 2026
About this mock
This mock test covers the forensic science of biometric Presentation Attack Detection (PAD) -- the discipline of determining whether a biometric sample submitted to a sensor is from a live, genuine user or from a spoof artefact (Presentation Attack Instrument, PAI). Topics span the full PAD standards ecosystem (ISO/IEC 30107-1, 30107-2, 30107-3), fingerprint spoofing materials (gelatin gummy fingers from the landmark Matsumoto 2002 study, latex, silicone, wood glue PVA), iris spoofing (printed contact lenses, video replay, prosthetic eyes), face spoofing (printed photos, video replay, 3D masks, deepfake injection attacks), voice spoofing (replay attacks, text-to-speech synthesis, voice conversion, deepfake audio), and liveness detection methods (eye blink challenge-response, rPPG pulse detection, fingerprint sweat pore analysis, LBP texture analysis, deep CNN feature extraction). PAD error metrics -- APCER (Attack Presentation Classification Error Rate), BPCER (Bona-fide Presentation Classification Error Rate), and ACER (Average Classification Error Rate) as defined in ISO/IEC 30107-3 -- are tested with precision, as are multispectral imaging principles and challenge-response liveness limitations against real-time deepfakes.
Indian and benchmark context is directly integrated: UIDAI's Aadhaar Registered Device (RD) framework mandating on-device fingerprint and iris liveness detection (AUA/KUA circular, 2018) is examined, along with CDAC biometric research contributions. The test draws on the ASVspoof challenge series (2015, 2017, 2019) for voice anti-spoofing benchmarks and the LivDet competition series (2009 onwards) for fingerprint liveness detection evaluation protocols and PAI material categories (gelatine, latex, silicone, wood glue).
Topics covered:
- ISO/IEC 30107-1/2/3 framework, vocabulary, and testing standards
- APCER, BPCER, ACER -- definitions, error directions, and threshold trade-offs
- Fingerprint spoofing: Matsumoto gummy finger (gelatine), latex, silicone, wood glue (PVA)
- Iris spoofing: printed contact lens, video replay, challenge-response pupil dilation
- Face spoofing: Replay-Attack database, 3D masks, Apple Face ID structured light
- Voice spoofing: ASVspoof 2015/2017/2019 LA vs PA tracks, voice conversion artefacts
- Liveness detection: rPPG pulse, sweat pore, LBP micro-texture, multispectral subsurface
- UIDAI Aadhaar RD liveness mandate and AUA/KUA compliance requirements
Designed for UGC-NET Paper II Unit VIII (Multimedia Forensics), NFSU MSc Digital Forensics entrance, and FACT aspirants covering biometric system security. Allow 30 minutes.
Sources & references
Questions in this mock are written and verified against the following sources. Citations are recorded per question and shown in the explanation after submission.
- cited in 16 questions
Marcel, Nixon, Li (Eds.) -- Handbook of Biometric Anti-Spoofing, 2nd Edition, Springer
Chapter 4: LivDet Competition Series -- PAI Material Categories and Cross-Edition Consistency
- cited in 4 questions
ISO/IEC 30107-3:2017 -- Biometric Presentation Attack Detection -- Part 3: Testing and Reporting
Section 6.4: ACER Definition and Threshold-Based Reporting
- cited in 3 questions
Jain, Ross, Nandakumar -- Introduction to Biometrics, Springer
Chapter 7: Biometric System Security, Iris Liveness Detection -- Pupil Dynamics and Challenge-Response
- cited in 2 questions
UIDAI -- Aadhaar Authentication Ecosystem: Registered Device Framework and Liveness Requirements
UIDAI RD Specification v2.0: Security Architecture and On-Device Liveness Rationale
- cited in 1 question
Apple Inc. -- Face ID Security Guide, 2020 Edition
Section: TrueDepth Camera Architecture and Anti-Spoofing Mechanisms
How our mocks are built
Questions are written and edited by the ForensicSpot team and cited from peer-reviewed forensic textbooks, official syllabi and primary case law. Each one is verified before publishing. Detailed explanations show after you submit, so the test stays a real test. See a mistake? Tell us.
Common questions
What does the Multimedia Forensics: Biometric Presentation Attack Detection and Spoofing mock cover?+
This mock test covers the forensic science of biometric Presentation Attack Detection (PAD) -- the discipline of determining whether a biometric sample submitted to a sensor is from a live, genuine user or from a spoof artefact (Presentation Attack Instrument, PAI). Topics span the full PAD standards ecosystem (ISO/IEC 30107-1, 30107-2, 30107-3), fingerprint spoofing materials (gelatin gummy fingers from the landmark Matsumoto 2002 study, latex, silicone, wood glue PVA), iris spoofing (printed c
How many questions and how long is the test?+
26 multiple-choice questions, 30 minutes total. Difficulty: hard. Tier: Premium.
Who is this mock for?+
Forensic science students and aspirants who want timed, exam-style practice with explanations and verified source citations on Multimedia Authentication and Deepfake Forensics, NET. Useful for postgraduate entrance preparation and for BSc / MSc forensic students testing their recall under time.
Are the questions reviewed?+
Each question carries a verified source citation. Faculty review for individual questions is in progress.
Do I need an account to take this mock?+
Yes, a free ForensicSpot account is required to start a timed attempt — this lets you save progress, see per-question explanations after submission, and track your topic-level performance over time.