Skip to content
Forensic Psychologymedium Premium

Forensic Psychology: Eyewitness Evidence, Interviewing, and False Confessions

Published:

Reviewed by Bismith B · 11 Jun 2026

Questions

30

Duration

30 min

Faculty-reviewed

0

Updated

09 Jun 2026

Score, per-question explanations and topic breakdown shown right after you submit.

About this mock

This test examines core concepts in the psychology of eyewitness evidence, investigative interviewing, and confession science. Questions probe the distinction between estimator and system variables in eyewitness identification, the principles of lineup construction and administration, and the mechanisms behind the misinformation effect first described by Elizabeth Loftus. The confidence-accuracy relationship and its forensic implications are tested through application scenarios. The Cognitive Interview protocol developed by Geiselman and Fisher is assessed in contrast to standard police interviewing. The Reid Technique's theoretical assumptions and documented criticisms are explored. Finally, the typology of false and coerced confessions, including voluntary, internalised, and compliant forms identified by Kassin and Wrightsman, is tested alongside the risk factors that make certain individuals vulnerable. Internationally recognised landmark studies and frameworks form the evidence base throughout. Practitioners, researchers, and advanced students working in legal psychology, criminal investigation, or forensic science policy will find this test a rigorous assessment of applied knowledge.

Sources & references

Questions in this mock are written and verified against the following sources. Citations are recorded per question and shown in the explanation after submission.

  • Kassin, S. M., et al., Police-Induced Confessions: Risk Factors and Recommendations (Law and Human Behavior, 2010)

    Section on false evidence ploys and internalised confession risk

    cited in 5 questions
  • Wells, G. L., & Olson, E. A., Eyewitness Testimony (Annual Review of Psychology, 2003)

    Section on system variable reforms: blind administration and post-identification feedback

    cited in 3 questions
  • Gudjonsson, G. H., The Psychology of Interrogations and Confessions: A Handbook (Wiley, 2003)

    Chapter on the GSS subscales, yield and shift

    cited in 3 questions
  • Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E., Memory-Enhancing Techniques for Investigative Interviewing: The Cognitive Interview (Charles C Thomas, 1992)

    Chapter on the four retrieval mnemonics of the ECI

    cited in 2 questions
  • National Research Council, Identifying the Culprit: Assessing Eyewitness Identification (National Academies Press, 2014)

    Chapter on recommended pre-lineup instructions

    cited in 2 questions
  • Wells, G. L., Applied eyewitness-testimony research: System variables and estimator variables (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978)

    Original statement of the estimator versus system variable framework

    cited in 1 question
  • Kassin, S. M., & Wrightsman, L. S., Confession evidence, in The Psychology of Evidence and Trial Procedure (Sage, 1985)

    Chapter section on the voluntary false confession definition and examples

    cited in 1 question
  • Steblay, N., Dysart, J., Fulero, S., & Lindsay, R. C. L., Eyewitness accuracy rates in police showup and lineup presentations: A meta-analytic comparison (Law and Human Behavior, 2003)

    Meta-analysis comparing showup and lineup false identification rates

    cited in 1 question
  • Meissner, C. A., & Brigham, J. C., Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces (Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2001)

    Meta-analytic review, sections on hit rates and false alarm rates

    cited in 1 question
  • Koehnken, G., Milne, R., Memon, A., & Bull, R., The cognitive interview: A meta-analysis (Psychology, Crime and Law, 1999)

    Overall meta-analytic results across studies

    cited in 1 question
  • Wells, G. L., & Bradfield, A. L., 'Good, you identified the suspect': Feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience (Journal of Applied Psychology, 1998)

    Study 1, feedback manipulation and retrospective reports

    cited in 1 question
  • Milne, R., & Bull, R., Investigative Interviewing: Psychology and Practice (Wiley, 1999)

    Chapter on the PEACE framework and its development

    cited in 1 question
  • Deffenbacher, K. A., et al., A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory (Law and Human Behavior, 2004)

    Meta-analytic results on stress, arousal, and identification accuracy

    cited in 1 question
  • Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S., Source monitoring (Psychological Bulletin, 1993)

    Applications to eyewitness memory and post-event information

    cited in 1 question
  • Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., et al., Enhancement of eyewitness memory: An empirical evaluation of the cognitive interview (Journal of Police Science and Administration, 1984)

    Theoretical rationale and original experimental design

    cited in 1 question
  • Loftus, E. F., Eyewitness Testimony (Harvard University Press, 1979)

    Chapter on the reconstruction of automobile destruction

    cited in 1 question
  • Lindsay, R. C. L., & Wells, G. L., Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation (Journal of Applied Psychology, 1985)

    Experiments 1 and 2, comparison of simultaneous and sequential conditions

    cited in 1 question
  • Wixted, J. T., & Wells, G. L., The relationship between eyewitness confidence and identification accuracy: A new synthesis (Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2017)

    Section on calibration and initial confidence

    cited in 1 question
  • Kassin, S. M., & Wrightsman, L. S., Confession evidence, in S. M. Kassin & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), The Psychology of Evidence and Trial Procedure (Sage, 1985)

    Chapter on the taxonomy of true and false confessions

    cited in 1 question
  • Loftus, E. F., Loftus, G. R., & Messo, J., Some facts about weapon focus (Law and Human Behavior, 1987)

    Experiments 1 and 2, fixation patterns and face recognition

    cited in 1 question

How our mocks are built

Questions are written and edited by the ForensicSpot team and cited from peer-reviewed forensic textbooks, official syllabi and primary case law. Each one is verified before publishing. Detailed explanations show after you submit, so the test stays a real test. See a mistake? Tell us.

Common questions

What does the Forensic Psychology: Eyewitness Evidence, Interviewing, and False Confessions mock cover?+

This test examines core concepts in the psychology of eyewitness evidence, investigative interviewing, and confession science. Questions probe the distinction between estimator and system variables in eyewitness identification, the principles of lineup construction and administration, and the mechanisms behind the misinformation effect first described by Elizabeth Loftus. The confidence-accuracy relationship and its forensic implications are tested through application scenarios. The Cognitive In

How many questions and how long is the test?+

30 multiple-choice questions, 30 minutes total. Difficulty: medium. Tier: Premium.

Who is this mock for?+

Forensic science students and aspirants who want timed, exam-style practice with explanations and verified source citations on Forensic Psychology. Useful for postgraduate entrance preparation and for BSc / MSc forensic students testing their recall under time.

Are the questions reviewed?+

Each question carries a verified source citation. Faculty review for individual questions is in progress.

Do I need an account to take this mock?+

Yes, a free ForensicSpot account is required to start a timed attempt — this lets you save progress, see per-question explanations after submission, and track your topic-level performance over time.

Your journey to becoming a forensic professional starts here.

Practice with mock tests, learn from structured notes, and get your questions answered by a global forensic community, all in one place.