Forensic Physics: Glass Fracture Analysis and 3R Rule
Published:
Questions
30
Duration
30 min
Faculty-reviewed
0
Updated
25 May 2026
About this mock
Medium-band UGC-NET Forensic Science Paper II Unit VII drill on the forensic examination of fractured glass, covering radial and concentric fractures, the 3R rule, Wallner lines, Hertzian cone mechanics, bullet bevel direction, the ALER (Mahatma) sequencing rule, hackle marks, tempered glass failure, and multiple-impact stop-line interpretation. The set opens with the fundamental distinction between radial fractures, which radiate outward from the impact point and form first, and concentric fractures, which encircle the impact point and form second as the glass pane elastically rebounds. Stress marks (conchoidal fractures, rib marks) on the cross-sections of these fractures are the primary data for the 3R rule: on Radial fractures the rib marks meet the surface at Right angles on the Reverse side from the applied force, giving the examiner a reliable compass pointing back to the impact surface without knowing which side of the glass faced the shooter or the stone. Wallner lines, also called rib marks, are the curved stress-wave interference patterns on radial fracture surfaces that confirm the fracture propagation direction. Hertzian cone mechanics govern point-impact fractures: a cone of compression forms beneath the contact point and propagates into the glass, producing the characteristic Hertzian or cone fracture ring around the point of impact. Bullet holes produce a distinctive inward bevel at the entry surface (smaller hole, glass excavated toward the interior) and an outward bevel at the exit surface (larger crater, glass missing on the far side), a key direction-of-fire indicator used by CFSL Chandigarh examiners and documented in ASTM E1492. The ALER mnemonic encodes the Mahatma rule for fracture sequence: A Lateral cracks form Earlier than Radial cracks when two impacts are present, so a radial from one impact that terminates at the concentric of another establishes which impact came first.
Targeted at UGC-NET Forensic Science Paper II aspirants (Unit VII, Physical Evidence), NFSU MSc Forensic Chemistry students, FACT aptitude candidates, and CFSL and state FSL trainees rotating through the glass and paint examination section. Questions are calibrated at medium difficulty with near-neighbour distractors drawn from common student confusions: radial vs concentric timing, inward vs outward bevel, Wallner lines vs hackle marks, and the 3R rule vs the ALER rule.
Topics covered:
- Radial and concentric fracture formation sequence and identification
- 3R rule: Right angles on Reverse of Radial stress marks to determine impact side
- Wallner lines (rib marks): stress-wave interference patterns on radial surfaces
- Hertzian cone mechanics: compression cone beneath point of impact
- Bullet hole bevel: inward bevel at entry, outward bevel at exit
- ALER / Mahatma rule: fracture sequence from stop-line termination
- Hackle marks: terminal velocity fracture propagation zone
- Tempered glass: dice fracture pattern, absence of radial and concentric fractures
Work through each question before checking the explanation, and revisit every wrong answer against the cited Caddy, Curran, Saferstein, and ASTM E1492 references. Allow 30 minutes.
Sources & references
Questions in this mock are written and verified against the following sources. Citations are recorded per question and shown in the explanation after submission.
- cited in 15 questions
Caddy, Brian (ed.) -- Forensic Examination of Glass and Paint: Analysis and Interpretation, Taylor & Francis
Chapter 2: Glass Fracture Mechanics -- Stress marks, rib marks, Wallner lines: formation, orientation and 3R rule application
- cited in 8 questions
Curran, James M., Hicks, Tacha N., and Buckleton, John S. -- Forensic Interpretation of Glass Evidence, CRC Press
Chapter 3: Fracture Examination -- Wallner lines vs hackle marks: perpendicular vs parallel orientation relative to propagation direction
- cited in 5 questions
Saferstein, Richard -- Criminalistics: An Introduction to Forensic Science, 12th Edition, Pearson
Chapter 4: Physical Evidence -- Glass fracture types, radial and concentric geometry, impact point location
- cited in 2 questions
ASTM E1492 -- Standard Practice for Receiving, Documenting, Storing, and Retrieving Evidence in a Forensic Science Laboratory, ASTM International
Full standard: evidence management, packaging, chain of custody, storage conditions for physical evidence including glass fragments
How our mocks are built
Questions are written and edited by the ForensicSpot team and cited from peer-reviewed forensic textbooks, official syllabi and primary case law. Each one is verified before publishing. Detailed explanations show after you submit, so the test stays a real test. See a mistake? Tell us.
Common questions
What does the Forensic Physics: Glass Fracture Analysis and 3R Rule mock cover?+
Medium-band UGC-NET Forensic Science Paper II Unit VII drill on the forensic examination of fractured glass, covering radial and concentric fractures, the 3R rule, Wallner lines, Hertzian cone mechanics, bullet bevel direction, the ALER (Mahatma) sequencing rule, hackle marks, tempered glass failure, and multiple-impact stop-line interpretation. The set opens with the fundamental distinction between radial fractures, which radiate outward from the impact point and form first, and concentric frac
How many questions and how long is the test?+
30 multiple-choice questions, 30 minutes total. Difficulty: medium. Tier: Premium.
Who is this mock for?+
Forensic science students and aspirants who want timed, exam-style practice with explanations and verified source citations on Forensic Physics, NET. Useful for postgraduate entrance preparation and for BSc / MSc forensic students testing their recall under time.
Are the questions reviewed?+
Each question carries a verified source citation. Faculty review for individual questions is in progress.
Do I need an account to take this mock?+
Yes, a free ForensicSpot account is required to start a timed attempt — this lets you save progress, see per-question explanations after submission, and track your topic-level performance over time.