Forensic Chemistry: GC-MS, GC-ECD and LC-MS for Post-Blast Analysis
Published:
Questions
30
Duration
30 min
Faculty-reviewed
0
Updated
24 May 2026
Free credits are now limited to 5 per account and will no longer reset monthly Claim now.
Practice with national-level exam (FACT, FACT Plus, NET, CUET, etc.) mocks, learn from structured notes, and get your doubts solved in one place.
Published:
Questions
30
Duration
30 min
Faculty-reviewed
0
Updated
24 May 2026
Score, per-question explanations and topic breakdown shown right after you submit.
Free ForensicSpot account required to save your progress — you’ll sign in when you start.
UGC-NET Forensic Science Unit VI advanced drill on the instrumental methods used for detecting and confirming organic explosive residues in post-blast debris. Coverage spans GC-MS column selection (DB-5, DB-XLB), electron ionisation characteristic ions for TNT (m/z 210 base peak, [M-OH]+) and RDX (m/z 128, 81, 42), chemical ionisation for thermally labile nitrate esters, and the distinction between EI and CI ionisation modes in forensic explosive analysis.
GC-ECD and GC-TEA questions focus on the electron capture mechanism (Ni-63 source, nitrogen makeup gas, sub-picogram LODs for PETN and NG), TEA pyrolysis at 400 to 500 degrees C and NO-ozone chemiluminescence, and the complementary selectivity relationship between the two detectors for nitro versus halogen interferences. LC-MS and LC-MS-MS questions address why peroxide explosives HMTD and TATP require electrospray rather than GC methods, negative-mode MRM transitions for TNT (226 to 46) and RDX (chloride adduct m/z 257), APCI versus ESI source selection, and ammonium adduct formation for TATP detection. Ion mobility spectrometry coverage includes the Smiths IONSCAN 600 drift-tube principle, the K0 reduced-mobility calculation, DNT cross-reactivity causing false positives, and the confirmatory role of GC-MS after a presumptive IMS positive.
The final section covers portable Raman and FTIR for bulk explosive identification (RDX fingerprint at 800 to 1000 cm-1, TNT asymmetric NO2 stretch at 1540 cm-1), advantages of Raman over FTIR for wet samples at scenes, and the identification criteria and reporting obligations from ASTM E2998-16 and the ENFSI Best Practice Manual for the Forensic Analysis of Explosions.
This mock is calibrated for UGC-NET Paper II Unit VI top-decile candidates, NFSU MSc Forensic Chemistry applicants, and practising forensic chemists reviewing post-blast analytical protocols for accreditation.
Topics covered:
Allow 30 minutes.
Questions are written and edited by the ForensicSpot team and cited from peer-reviewed forensic textbooks, official syllabi and primary case law. Each one is verified before publishing. Detailed explanations show after you submit, so the test stays a real test. See a mistake? Tell us.