Forensic Chemistry: Fibre Identification with FTIR, Raman and PGC-MS
Published:
Questions
30
Duration
30 min
Faculty-reviewed
0
Updated
25 May 2026
Practice with national-level exam (FACT, FACT Plus, NET, CUET, etc.) mocks, learn from structured notes, and get your doubts solved in one place.
Published:
Questions
30
Duration
30 min
Faculty-reviewed
0
Updated
25 May 2026
Score, per-question explanations and topic breakdown shown right after you submit.
Free ForensicSpot account required to save your progress — you’ll sign in when you start.
This medium-difficulty UGC-NET Forensic Science Paper II Unit VII drill covers the forensic identification of textile fibres using polarising microscopy, FTIR spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, pyrolysis-GC-MS (PGC-MS), and microspectrophotometry (MSP). Questions range from natural fibre morphology (cotton bilobate cross-section, wool cortex-cuticle structure, silk triangular cross-section, linen node intervals) through synthetic polymer fingerprinting (nylon 6 caprolactam vs nylon 6,6 hexamethylenediamine pyrolysates; PET ester carbonyl at 1712 cm-1 vs PBT at 1711 cm-1; acrylic polyacrylonitrile nitrile stretch at 2240 cm-1; polypropylene CH2 rocking doublet) to dye-class discrimination by HPLC and TLC. SWGMAT fibre sub-group guidelines structure the comparison hierarchy: class determination by FTIR and PGC-MS, followed by subclass by Raman and MSP for dyed fibres, then colour comparison. Birefringence values and sign of elongation distinguish cotton (positive, low birefringence) from linen (positive, higher birefringence) and wool (nearly isotropic under polarised light), which are the near-neighbour distractors most frequently tested. The CFSL Kolkata trace-evidence section follows Robertson and Grieve's tiered comparison protocol and ASTM E2227 for fibre examination terminology.
Aimed at UGC-NET Forensic Science Paper II aspirants covering Unit VII (Fibres and Textile Fibres), NFSU MSc Forensic Chemistry students, FACT aptitude candidates, and CFSL and state FSL scientists rotating through the trace-evidence section. Core references are Robertson and Grieve (Forensic Examination of Fibres, 2nd ed.), Houck and Siegel (Fundamentals of Forensic Science, 3rd ed.), Saferstein (Criminalistics, 12th ed.), and the SWGMAT fibre examination guidelines.
Topics covered:
Work through each question before reading the explanation, then revisit errors against the Robertson and Grieve, Saferstein, Houck and Siegel, and SWGMAT citations. Allow 30 minutes.
Questions are written and edited by the ForensicSpot team and cited from peer-reviewed forensic textbooks, official syllabi and primary case law. Each one is verified before publishing. Detailed explanations show after you submit, so the test stays a real test. See a mistake? Tell us.