Fingerprint Sciences: Latent Fingerprint Development Methods
Published:
Questions
30
Duration
30 min
Faculty-reviewed
0
Updated
26 May 2026
Practice with national-level exam (FACT, FACT Plus, NET, CUET, etc.) mocks, learn from structured notes, and get your doubts solved in one place.
Published:
Questions
30
Duration
30 min
Faculty-reviewed
0
Updated
26 May 2026
Score, per-question explanations and topic breakdown shown right after you submit.
Free ForensicSpot account required to save your progress — you’ll sign in when you start.
UGC-NET Forensic Science Paper II Unit VIII drill on the chemistry, substrate specificity, sequencing, and operational parameters of latent fingerprint development. The set covers the full technique ladder: powder methods (conventional black, white, grey, magnetic, and fluorescent powders and their substrate matching rules), ninhydrin and its Ruhemann's purple amino-acid product on porous surfaces, DFO (1,8-diazafluoren-9-one) as a fluorescent predecessor to ninhydrin in the reagent sequence, 1,2-indanedione as a zinc-complex fluorescent agent for aged prints on paper, cyanoacrylate (superglue) fuming for non-porous surfaces, vacuum metal deposition (VMD) with sequential gold and zinc deposition on polymer films, Reflected UV Imaging System (RUVIS) as a non-destructive optical screening tool, silver nitrate's chloride-ion reaction on porous substrates, iodine fuming as a temporary lipid-reactive method, and Small Particle Reagent (SPR) for wet or submerged surfaces. Substrate classification (porous, non-porous, semi-porous) and the recommended processing sequence (optical first, then non-destructive, then destructive) are tested throughout.
Aimed at UGC-NET Forensic Science Paper II aspirants targeting Unit VIII (Fingerprints), NFSU MSc Forensic Science students, CFSL Chandigarh and state FSL fingerprint-section trainees, and NCRB CFPB candidates preparing for the national fingerprint bureau proficiency examination.
Topics covered:
Work through each question before checking the explanation, and revisit every wrong answer against the cited Champod et al., Lee and Gaensslen, and SWGFAST references. Allow 30 minutes.
Questions are written and edited by the ForensicSpot team and cited from peer-reviewed forensic textbooks, official syllabi and primary case law. Each one is verified before publishing. Detailed explanations show after you submit, so the test stays a real test. See a mistake? Tell us.