Fingerprint Sciences: Chance Prints and BSA Section 39 Admissibility
Published:
Questions
30
Duration
30 min
Faculty-reviewed
0
Updated
26 May 2026
Practice with national-level exam (FACT, FACT Plus, NET, CUET, etc.) mocks, learn from structured notes, and get your doubts solved in one place.
Published:
Questions
30
Duration
30 min
Faculty-reviewed
0
Updated
26 May 2026
Score, per-question explanations and topic breakdown shown right after you submit.
Free ForensicSpot account required to save your progress — you’ll sign in when you start.
This mock test covers the forensic and legal dimensions of chance print evidence and expert opinion admissibility in Indian courts. Topics include the analysis of latent chance prints deposited inadvertently at crime scenes, the minimum matching minutiae required for a valid identification under the 12-point standard followed by DFSS and NCRB, the pre-2001 UK 8 to 16 point range and its abolition in favour of a no-threshold holistic approach, and the post-Daubert US position requiring ACE-V qualitative-quantitative judgment with no fixed numerical floor. The legal framework centres on Section 39 BSA 2023 (formerly Section 45 IEA 1872) governing expert opinion admissibility, the Identification of Prisoners Act 1920 on fingerprint collection from arrested and convicted persons, Section 23 BSA 2023 (formerly Section 27 IEA 1872) on confessions leading to discovery, and Article 20(3) of the Constitution as interpreted in State of Bombay v Kathi Kalu Oghad (1961) 3 SCR 10.
The Indian context is addressed through the NCRB Central Fingerprint Bureau (CFPB), the NAFIS platform launched in 2022, DFSS expert qualification requirements, and Supreme Court judgments including Mohd. Aman v State of Rajasthan (1997) 10 SCC 44 on conclusive proof, State of UP v Ram Babu Mishra (1980) 2 SCC 343 on the court's power to summon experts, and Murari Lal v State of MP (1980) 1 SCC 704 on the court's autonomous comparison role. Questions test precise statutory section numbers, the BSA 2023 / IEA 1872 transition effective 1 July 2024, fetal ridge-skin development, AFIS processing pipelines, and the physical-versus-testimonial evidence distinction under Article 20(3).
Topics covered:
All questions are calibrated to the hard difficulty level, with distractors differing on one specific parameter such as section number, point threshold, or constitutional article. Allow 30 minutes.
Questions are written and edited by the ForensicSpot team and cited from peer-reviewed forensic textbooks, official syllabi and primary case law. Each one is verified before publishing. Detailed explanations show after you submit, so the test stays a real test. See a mistake? Tell us.