Skip to content

Concurrent evidence (hot-tubbing)

Definition

A procedure used in some common-law jurisdictions, particularly in Australia and international arbitration, where opposing experts are examined simultaneously by the tribunal and by each other rather than sequentially. It often surfaces genuine areas of agreement more quickly than adversarial sequential testimony.

Related terms

CPR Part 35
The Civil Procedure Rules section governing expert evidence in England and Wales. It establishes the expert's overriding duty to the court, the...
Daubert standard
The US federal evidentiary standard (Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 1993) requiring that expert testimony be based on scientifically valid methods with...
Expert's overriding duty
The principle, codified in CPR Part 35.3 and equivalent rules, that an expert witness's primary obligation is to assist the court rather...
Frye standard
The US legal test for admissibility of scientific evidence, originating from Frye v. United States (1923), which required that a technique be...
Section 45 (Indian Evidence Act)
The provision of the Indian Evidence Act 1872 that permits courts to consider the opinions of persons with special skill in science...

Explained in

  • Expert Testimony and Court StandardsA procedure used in some common-law jurisdictions, particularly in Australia and international arbitration, where opposing experts are examined simultaneously...

Your journey to becoming a forensic professional starts here.

Practice with mock tests, learn from structured notes, and get your questions answered by a global forensic community, all in one place.