Digital Forensics: Virtual Machine and Cloud Forensic Scenarios
Published:
Questions
30
Duration
30 min
Faculty-reviewed
0
Updated
20 May 2026
About this mock
FACT Digital Forensics paper drill on applied virtual machine and cloud forensic scenarios, sitting one level above the introductory definitions mock on the same syllabus. Questions place the candidate inside a specific case and ask which technique applies: choosing between live and offline acquisition for a fileless guest, picking the right VMware artefact (.vmem at a snapshot, .vmss at a suspend, .vmsn for metadata), mounting VMDK chains and Hyper-V .avhdx differencing disks as ordered overlays, converting QCOW2 to raw with qemu-img convert, reading vmware.log for VM escape signals, inspecting VMFS datastores through vmfs-tools, recognising MITRE ATT&CK T1497 anti-VM checks via CPUID and MAC OUI, walking the Docker OverlayFS layer stack, retaining Kubernetes emptyDir evidence by shipping logs, acquiring vSAN through the API rather than by pulling drives, and choosing in-guest tools such as LiME or AVML for live memory. The cloud half tests log-source selection between CloudTrail, VPC Flow Logs, CloudWatch Logs, and S3 access logs, the iam:CreateAccessKey to iam:AttachUserPolicy escalation chain under MITRE T1098, the volatile-first acquisition order paired with EBS snapshot copy across accounts and regions, multi-tenancy under NIST IR 8006, KMS misuse evidence (key policy, grants, last-used), least-privilege failures in IAM JSON, the interaction of CLOUD Act 2018, IT Rules 2021, and DPDP Act 2023, MLAT preservation requests, Lambda forensics through CloudWatch Logs only, Azure Diagnostic Settings for Resource Logs, GCP Cloud Audit Logs Admin Activity vs Data Access, CloudTrail digest-chain tampering indicators, and S3 Object Lock compliance mode plus MFA Delete for legal hold.
For FACT digital-forensics aspirants and MSc students working through applied virtualisation and cloud incident-response scenarios, useful as a revision pass before NFSU MSc, GCFA, SANS FOR509, CCSP, and AWS Security Specialty exams. Questions emphasise picking the right technique under a specific scenario rather than reciting definitions, with Indian and US legal anchors for cross-border cloud cases.
Topics covered:
- Live vs offline VM acquisition for fileless and snapshot scenarios
- VMware .vmem, .vmss, .vmsn, .vmx, VMDK chains and ESXi VMFS datastores
- Hyper-V .avhdx checkpoint chains and VirtualBox .vbox and .vdi files
- QCOW2 to raw conversion with qemu-img and qemu-nbd cross-format mounting
- Container OverlayFS layers and Kubernetes emptyDir evidence retention
- AWS log-source selection: CloudTrail, VPC Flow Logs, CloudWatch, S3 access logs
- IAM escalation chains, KMS audit, least-privilege failures, MITRE T1098 and T1497
- EBS snapshot acquisition order and cross-region cross-account chain-of-custody
- CLOUD Act 2018, IT Rules 2021, DPDP Act 2023, MLAT preservation requests
- Lambda, Azure Resource Logs, GCP Audit Log streams, CloudTrail integrity, S3 Object Lock
Useful for revision and self-testing before the FACT Digital Forensics paper.
Allow 30 minutes.
Sources & references
Questions in this mock are written and verified against the following sources. Citations are recorded per question and shown in the explanation after submission.
- cited in 9 questions
Amazon Web Services
AWS CloudTrail and VPC Flow Logs user guides on event records and flow record formats
Open source - cited in 6 questions
VMware, Inc.
VMware documentation: virtual machine file types and vmss2core utility for memory dumps
Open source - cited in 2 questions
- cited in 2 questions
MITRE Corporation
MITRE ATT&CK Technique T1098: Account Manipulation, with AWS sub-technique mappings
Open source - cited in 2 questions
Microsoft Corporation
Microsoft documentation: VHDX format, differencing disks, and Hyper-V checkpoints
Open source - cited in 1 question
- cited in 1 question
- cited in 1 question
Government of India and Microsoft
Ministry of Home Affairs MLAT guidance and Microsoft Online Services Law Enforcement Requests Portal
Open source - cited in 1 question
Cloud Native Computing Foundation
Kubernetes documentation: emptyDir volumes and pod lifecycle
Open source - cited in 1 question
Ligh, Case, Levy, Walters
The Art of Memory Forensics, Chapter on Acquiring Memory from Virtual Machines
- cited in 1 question
Google Cloud
Google Cloud documentation: Cloud Audit Logs streams (Admin Activity, Data Access, System Event, Policy Denied)
Open source - cited in 1 question
NIST Interagency Report 8006
NIST Cloud Computing Forensic Science Challenges: Multi-tenancy and Architecture sections
Open source - cited in 1 question
Oracle Corporation
Oracle VirtualBox User Manual: Configuration files and the .vbox XML format
Open source - cited in 1 question
United States Congress and Government of India
CLOUD Act 2018 (Pub. L. 115-141, Div. V), IT Rules 2021, Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023
Open source
How our mocks are built
Questions are written and edited by the ForensicSpot team and cited from peer-reviewed forensic textbooks, official syllabi and primary case law. Each one is verified before publishing. Detailed explanations show after you submit, so the test stays a real test. See a mistake? Tell us.
Common questions
What does the Digital Forensics: Virtual Machine and Cloud Forensic Scenarios mock cover?+
FACT Digital Forensics paper drill on applied virtual machine and cloud forensic scenarios, sitting one level above the introductory definitions mock on the same syllabus. Questions place the candidate inside a specific case and ask which technique applies: choosing between live and offline acquisition for a fileless guest, picking the right VMware artefact (.vmem at a snapshot, .vmss at a suspend, .vmsn for metadata), mounting VMDK chains and Hyper-V .avhdx differencing disks as ordered overlay
How many questions and how long is the test?+
30 multiple-choice questions, 30 minutes total. Difficulty: medium. Tier: Premium.
Who is this mock for?+
Forensic science students and aspirants who want timed, exam-style practice with explanations and verified source citations on Digital Forensics, FACT. Useful for postgraduate entrance preparation and for BSc / MSc forensic students testing their recall under time.
Are the questions reviewed?+
Each question carries a verified source citation. Faculty review for individual questions is in progress.
Do I need an account to take this mock?+
Yes, a free ForensicSpot account is required to start a timed attempt — this lets you save progress, see per-question explanations after submission, and track your topic-level performance over time.