Practice with national-level exam (FACT, FACT Plus, NET, CUET, etc.) mocks, learn from structured notes, and get your doubts solved in one place.
Timed practice tests with instant scoring and per-question explanations.
This mock covers the glass and soil trace-evidence sections of the FACT Forensic Physics syllabus and the trace-evidence portion of the UGC-NET Forensic Science paper. Thirty questions across the techniques and interpretation principles every BSc and first-year MSc forensic-science student must lock in: refractive-index measurement of recovered glass fragments by the GRIM 3 hot-stage / oil-immersion method, density comparison by sink-float and the density-gradient column, elemental analysis by LIBS, micro X-ray fluorescence (muXRF), SEM-EDX, and laser-ablation ICP-MS, fracture-pattern interpretation (Wallner lines, hackle marks, conchoidal / crater fracture, the 4R rule for radial cracks, sequencing two impacts on a single pane), the Bayesian / likelihood-ratio framework for reporting glass evidence, and the corresponding suite of soil techniques: colour comparison against the Munsell soil-colour chart in moist and dry states, mineral identification by polarised-light microscopy, particle-size (texture) analysis, soil pH and loss-on-ignition for organic content, density-gradient comparison of soil banding, and the biological provenance markers — pollen, spores, and diatoms — together with their preparation by Erdtman acetolysis and the diatom test for drowning. It is pitched at BSc and first-year MSc forensic-science students at NFSU, LNJN-NICFS, and other Indian universities, FACT and FACT Plus aspirants, and UGC-NET candidates who need the trace-evidence physics sections locked in before tackling case law and casework reconstruction. This is the introductory-tier mock for the topic — definitions, instrument identification, and the most-asked interpretation rules. Themes covered: - Refractive index by GRIM 3 oil-immersion / hot-stage Becke-line method (ASTM E1967) - Float-glass tin side vs air side; UV fluorescence and surface-vs-bulk RI - Density by sink-float and the density-gradient column - Elemental analysis: LIBS, muXRF (ASTM E2926), SEM-EDX, LA-ICP-MS (ASTM E2927) - Fracture features: Wallner lines, hackle / rib marks, conchoidal / crater fracture - Direction of force (4R rule for radial cracks) and sequence of multiple impacts - Soil colour with the Munsell chart (moist and dry, hue / value / chroma) - Soil density-gradient comparison; particle-size (sand / silt / clay) texture - Soil chemistry: pH at 1:2.5 with water; loss-on-ignition for organic content - Mineral identification by polarised-light microscopy (RI, birefringence, extinction, pleochroism, habit) - Forensic palynology — pollen and spores by Erdtman acetolysis - Diatoms and the drowning test - Geographic provenance limitations and the Bayesian / likelihood-ratio framework - Collection and packaging: paper bindles (druggist fold), control samples, contamination Each question carries a detailed 220+ word explanation citing standard references — Saferstein's Criminalistics, Houck and Siegel's Fundamentals, James and Nordby's Forensic Science, the Curran / Hicks / Buckleton monograph on the Forensic Interpretation of Glass Evidence, Pye's Geological and Soil Evidence, Murray's Evidence from the Earth, the SWGMAT glass guideline, ASTM E1492, E1967, E2926 and E2927, the Munsell soil-colour-chart user guide, the Mildenhall-Wiltshire-Bryant palynology review, and Pollanen on forensic diatomology. Allow 15 minutes; the explanations are long enough to use as study notes by themselves.
This mock is the medium-difficulty companion to Mock #6 (Forensic Physics: Foundations). Same eight FACT Forensic Physics syllabus sub-topics, same 30-question, 15-minute format — but at the application level. Where the foundations paper asked "what is X?", this paper asks "you have evidence X, what do you do, and what does the result mean?". Calculations from the Beer-Lambert law, glass-fracture direction-of-impact, paint-layer mismatch interpretation, likelihood-ratio arithmetic, formant-frequency comparison, CCTV photogrammetric speed estimation, fire-pattern interpretation, and the v = √(2gμd) speed-from-skid formula all show up. It is pitched at second-year MSc forensic-science students at NFSU, LNJN-NICFS, GFSU and other Indian universities, FACT and FACT Plus aspirants who have the vocabulary down and now need to score on the applied paper, and UGC-NET candidates who want a calibration check before the exam. Pair this mock with #6: do #6 first, review the explanations, then attempt this one to see whether the foundational concepts have hardened into working knowledge. Themes covered: - Multi-evidence scene sequencing and the panchnama for digital + physical exhibits together - Wet-weapon preservation and the consequences of broken chain of custody - Beer-Lambert calculation; SEM-EDX interpretation (Pb-Sb-Ba GSR signature) - Choosing the right instrument: GRIM for glass, GC-MS for unknowns - The 3R rule applied to forced-entry direction; paint-chip layer mismatch interpretation - Tool-mark and tyre-mark class vs individual characteristics - Likelihood-ratio calculation (LR = 0.9 / 0.001 = 900) and posterior-odds combination - 95% confidence band from QC SD measurements - Formant-frequency comparison and intra- vs inter-speaker variability - GSM codec band-limit effects on forensic voice analysis - Sex / age inference from F0; falsetto disguise detection - De-interlacing for CCTV plate readability; speed estimation from frame count - DVR clock-skew documentation and the chain of custody - IS 269 cement adulteration interpretation; NFPA 921 fire-pattern + ILR analysis - Forensic palynology in soil comparison; SPR for wet-plastic latent prints - v = √(2gμd) skid-distance speed; ABS intermittent skid marks and the EDR - PDQ paint analysis as class-level evidence; tyre-mark class-vs-individual reporting Each question carries a detailed 220+ word explanation citing standard references (Saferstein, Sharma, NFPA 921, ENFSI, ASTM E1588, IS 269 / IS 4031, Daily & Strickland, Bodziak, Hollien, ACPO, SWGDE, Aitken & Taroni, Bandey Fingermark Visualisation Manual). Allow 15 minutes; the explanations double as study notes. The next three mocks (#8 Evidence Collection & Pattern Analysis; #9 Instruments & Spectroscopy; #10 Voice, Video & Reconstruction) are the hard premium papers that complete the FACT Forensic Physics series.
This mock covers the foundations of Forensic Physics as it appears in the FACT exam syllabus (Section B, Elective I, sub-section i). Thirty questions spread across all eight syllabus sub-topics — physical evidence collection from the scene, the analytical instruments used in the lab (microscopy, UV-Vis, SEM-EDX), pattern evidence (tool marks, glass fractures, paint, fibre, soil), the mathematics and statistics used to interpret results, forensic voice authentication, video analysis, criminalistics and forensic engineering (cement adulteration, nano-tech, arson investigation), and collision investigation and reconstruction. It is pitched at BSc and first-year MSc forensic science students at NFSU, LNJN-NICFS, and other Indian universities, FACT and FACT Plus aspirants, and UGC-NET candidates who need the Forensic Physics fundamentals locked in before tackling specialised papers. Forensic Physics is the broadest section of the FACT syllabus and the one where most candidates lose marks; this mock sits at the foundational level — vocabulary, definitions, and the most-asked concepts that anchor every later question. Themes covered: - Crime-scene first-responder priorities and the panchnama - Packaging biological vs physical evidence — paper vs plastic - Chain of custody as a documented audit trail - Compound, comparison and SEM-EDX microscopy — what each is for - Beer-Lambert law in UV-Vis spectrophotometry - Tool marks: impression vs striated; the comparison microscope - Glass fracture analysis and the 3R rule for direction-of-impact - Paint chip layer-structure analysis (PDQ) - Natural vs synthetic fibre identification - Mean / median / mode / SD; Bayes theorem and the likelihood ratio - Vocal formants, spectrograms, and forensic speaker identification - CCTV imaging best practice; de-interlacing; watermarking - Soil, cement (IS 269), nanotechnology and arson investigation - Skid marks, drag factor, the v = √(2gμd) speed-from-skid formula - Hit-and-run vehicle examination and tyre-mark analysis Each question carries a detailed 220+ word explanation citing standard references (Saferstein, Sharma, NFPA 921, ENFSI guidelines, NIJ Crime Scene Investigation Guide, IS 269 / IS 4031 series, Daily & Strickland on collision reconstruction). Allow 15 minutes; the explanations are long enough to use as study notes by themselves. If you can pass this mock comfortably, you have the FACT Forensic Physics vocabulary that the application-level (Mock #7) and mastery-level (Mocks #8–#10) papers build on.