Practice with national-level exam (FACT, FACT Plus, NET, CUET, etc.) mocks, learn from structured notes, and get your doubts solved in one place.
Timed practice tests with instant scoring and per-question explanations.
A comprehensive mixed mock drawing 5 questions from each of the two easy Forensic Medicine mocks, 10 from the medium mock, and 10 from the hard mock — providing a full cross-level challenge spanning core vocabulary, applied casework, and professional ethics. The 5 questions from Easy Mock 1 (Foundations) cover: strangulation types, rigor mortis PMI and sequence, manner of death classification, hanging definition, and abrasion features. The 5 questions from Easy Mock 2 (Burns, Head Injuries, Identity) cover: second-degree burn classification, dying declaration under Section 26 BSA 2023, extradural haemorrhage features, infanticide under Section 101 BNS 2023, and spermatozoa survival times. The 10 medium questions cover: distinguishing staged hanging from strangulation by ligature mark, SIDS diagnosis of exclusion, organophosphate autopsy findings, CO-Hb 38% clinical interpretation, delayed sexual assault examination at 96 hours, manner of death opinion vs court determination, post-mortem burns (absent soot + CO-Hb), Rule of Thumb PMI calculation, organophosphate cause vs manner, and POCSO age estimation protocol. The 10 hard questions cover: post-mortem alcohol in decomposed body, thin skull rule with cardiac disease, re-autopsy hyoid fracture assessment, COPD petechiae qualified interpretation, post-conviction disclosure obligation, fire death with competing SDH and CO-Hb, prosecution pressure for false PMI precision, FMO pressured to amend rape report, railway death post-mortem placement indicators, and confirmation bias from self-harm history. Allow 15 minutes.
A comprehensive mixed mock drawing 5 questions from each of the two easy Forensic Ballistics mocks, 10 from the medium mock, and 10 from the hard mock — giving a full cross-level challenge across definitions, applied casework, and professional integrity. The 5 questions from Easy Mock 1 (Foundations) cover: rifling definition, firing pin impression, internal ballistics, shot pattern for range estimation, and cartridge case extraction and ejection. The 5 questions from Easy Mock 2 (Firearm Types) cover: double-action revolver mechanism, shotgun choke, ricocheted bullet features, Hague Convention and FMJ ammunition, and revolver cylinder rotation mechanism. The 10 medium questions cover: class characteristic exclusion from twist direction mismatch, range estimation from soot without stippling, fragmented bullet examination, shot pattern interpolation for range estimation, cartridge case value without a bullet, high-velocity vs low-velocity wound ballistics, serial number restoration by acid etching, skull external bevelling as exit indicator, IBIS crime-to-crime link workflow, and reporting class characteristics matching multiple models. The 10 hard questions cover: institutional bias when examiner's colleague is suspect, GSR on occupationally exposed firearms officer, AFTE Theory with unexplained differences in 2 of 6 LEAs, re-examination with new 3D imaging technology, ejection pattern and shooter handedness challenge, contextual bias from pre-examination photograph, old ammunition headstamp discrepancy, smooth-bore katta forensic linkage possibilities, barrel wear after five years of continued use, and post-conviction exhibit mix-up voiding identification. Allow 15 minutes. Suitable for students who have completed all four individual mocks and want a cross-level revision challenge.
A comprehensive mixed mock drawing 10 easy, 10 medium, and 10 hard questions from all three Crime Scene Management mocks — giving a complete cross-level challenge in a single 30-question test. The 10 easy questions cover foundational vocabulary: primary crime scene definition, Locard's Exchange Principle, three-tier photography, chain of custody, PPE dual function, FRO role, grid search, walk-through purpose, trace evidence, search patterns, and scene documentation sequence. The 10 medium questions cover applied scenarios: search pattern selection for a paddy field scene, FRO response to a disturbed scene, GSR collection urgency, staged crime scene examiner response, competing evidence priorities triage, cast-off bloodstain significance, rain-adapted examination sequence, FRO briefing independence, hit-and-run vehicle examination sequence, and moved exhibit documentation. The 10 hard questions cover professional ethics, conflicting evidence, and integrity challenges: maintaining identification against alibi information, walk-through conclusion causing confirmation bias, exculpatory evidence reporting obligation, re-examination protocol, qualified manner of death opinion, time pressure and forensic accuracy, instruction to suppress evidence, institutional bias in colleague death investigation, suicide note versus inconsistent physical findings, and conflicting DNA versus fingerprint evidence. Allow 15 minutes. Suitable for students who have completed all three individual mocks and want a cross-level revision test.
This mixed-difficulty mock assesses the full breadth of Basics of Forensic Science in a single sitting — moving from foundational definitions through application-level analysis to critical scenario thinking. All thirty questions draw on topics not duplicated from the dedicated easy, medium, and hard mocks, making this an ideal final review or comprehensive diagnostic tool. The easy questions (1–10) cover the forensic anthropology biological profile (sex, age, stature, ancestry), cyanoacrylate fuming chemistry and non-porous surface development, forensic ballistics casework scope, Luminol chemiluminescence mechanism (haem pseudoperoxidase), the questioned documents discipline scope, modus operandi vs signature vs motive, forensic psychology vs forensic psychiatry, the grid search pattern and when it is preferred, elimination samples and their purpose, and ninhydrin producing Ruhemann's purple from amino acids. The medium questions (11–20) cover physical developer advantage on water-damaged documents (lipids vs amino acids), the Teichmann vs Takayama crystal test difference (brown rhombs vs pink needles), the 1,024 primary cells of the Henry Classification System, the ABAcard HemaTrace detection specificity (human haemoglobin monoclonal antibody), oxyhaemoglobin spectrophotometric Q-bands (542 nm and 577 nm), a likelihood ratio of 1.0 meaning no discriminatory information, NABL accreditation against ISO/IEC 17025, forensic taphonomy definition (all post-mortem processes), blind vs open proficiency testing, and the stochastic threshold role (homozygous call validity). The hard questions (21–30) cover the factors for evaluating secondary transfer plausibility, the professional response to an officer demanding a positive result, why probabilistic genotyping is recommended for complex mixtures, the prosecutor's fallacy (RMP ≠ probability of innocence), the full inputs required for scientifically defensible crime scene reconstruction, how to handle conflicting PMI estimates from multiple methods, unexplained report-vs-testimony discrepancy as a credibility issue, and the principle that courts may acquit despite strong forensic evidence or convict without it. Pitched at MSc Forensic Science students preparing for NFSU comprehensive examinations, FACT and FACT Plus aspirants, and UGC-NET candidates at all levels. Themes covered: - Forensic disciplines: forensic anthropology (biological profile), forensic ballistics, questioned documents, forensic taphonomy - Laboratory methods: cyanoacrylate fuming, physical developer, ninhydrin, Teichmann vs Takayama, HemaTrace, spectrophotometry - Fingerprints: Henry Classification (1,024 cells), stochastic vs analytical threshold - DNA: probabilistic genotyping, prosecutor's fallacy, likelihood ratio = 1.0, stochastic threshold - Investigation: grid search, elimination samples, blind proficiency testing, secondary transfer evaluation - Indian law: NABL / ISO 17025, expert report vs testimony, forensic science role in verdicts - Ethics and professional practice: officer pressure response, contradictory findings, PMI uncertainty Each question carries a detailed explanation citing Saferstein's Criminalistics, Buckleton's Forensic DNA Evidence Interpretation, Lee and Gaensslen's Advances in Fingerprint Technology, Byers' Introduction to Forensic Anthropology, Gaensslen's Sourcebook in Forensic Serology, and primary Indian legal sources. Allow 15 minutes.