Skip to content
NEThard Premium

Y-STR and Mitochondrial DNA: Lineage Analysis and Database Considerations (UGC-NET Unit III)

Published:

Questions

30

Duration

30 min

Faculty-reviewed

0

Updated

17 May 2026

Score, per-question explanations and topic breakdown shown right after you submit.

About this mock

Advanced UGC-NET Forensic Science Unit III drill on lineage markers: Y-chromosome short tandem repeats (Y-STR) and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). Y-STR coverage spans Yfiler Plus 27-locus and PowerPlex Y23 multiplexes, paternal inheritance with no recombination on the non-recombining region of Y (NRY), male-specific typing in sexual-assault casework, haplotype frequency estimation via the Y-chromosome haplotype reference database (YHRD), the counting and discrete laplace methods, inability of standard Y-STRs to resolve paternally related males, and use of rapidly mutating Y-STRs (DYS570, DYS576, DYF387S1). mtDNA coverage includes the 16,569 bp circular genome, the revised Cambridge Reference Sequence (rCRS, Anderson 1981 / Andrews 1999), hypervariable regions HV1, HV2, HV3, Sanger and massively parallel sequencing (MPS) workflows, point and length heteroplasmy, drift across tissues, maternal lineage, haplogroups (M and N for India), application to highly degraded samples (hair shafts, bones, ancient remains), EMPOP and SWGDAM interpretation guidelines, and casework benchmarks including the Romanov identification (Gill et al. 1994). Indian context covers ICMR, CCMB, CDFD, and CFSL DNA divisions.

Sources & references

Questions in this mock are written and verified against the following sources. Citations are recorded per question and shown in the explanation after submission.

  • SWGDAM Interpretation Guidelines for Mitochondrial DNA Analysis by Forensic DNA Testing Laboratories, 2019

    Section 3, Sequencing strategy including bidirectional read confirmation

    Open source
    cited in 3 questions
  • Parson W, Gusmao L, Hares DR et al., DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics: revised and extended guidelines for mitochondrial DNA typing, Forensic Science International Genetics 2014

    Volume 13, pages 134-142, including IUPAC ambiguity codes for point heteroplasmy

    Open source
    cited in 2 questions
  • Andrews RM, Kubacka I, Chinnery PF, Lightowlers RN, Turnbull DM, Howell N, Reanalysis and revision of the Cambridge reference sequence for human mitochondrial DNA, Nature Genetics 1999

    Volume 23, page 147, formal revision of Anderson 1981

    Open source
    cited in 2 questions
  • Butler JM, Advanced Topics in Forensic DNA Typing: Interpretation, 1st edition

    Chapter 15, Mitochondrial DNA, including comparative statistical strength versus autosomal STRs

    Open source
    cited in 2 questions
  • Just RS, Irwin JA, Parson W, Mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy in the emerging field of massively parallel sequencing, Forensic Science International Genetics 2015

    Volume 18, pages 131-139, foundational MPS mtDNA forensic validation review

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • Mulero JJ, Chang CW, Calandro LM et al., Development and validation of the AmpFlSTR Yfiler PCR Amplification Kit, Journal of Forensic Sciences 2006

    Volume 51, Issue 1, pages 64-75, including male-to-female sensitivity studies down to 1:1000 ratios

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • Lutz S, Weisser HJ, Heizmann J, Pollak S, Location and frequency of polymorphic positions in the mtDNA control region of individuals from Germany, International Journal of Legal Medicine 1998

    Volume 111, pages 67-77, with subsequent EMPOP and SWGDAM updates on HV3 utility

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • Stewart JEB, Fisher CL, Aagaard PJ, Wilson MR, Isenberg AR, Polanskey D, Pokorak E, DiZinno JA, Budowle B, Length variation in HV2 of the human mitochondrial DNA control region, Journal of Forensic Sciences 2001

    Volume 46, pages 862-870, classic forensic description of HV2 length heteroplasmy

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • Directorate of Forensic Science Services, Ministry of Home Affairs, India, Forensic Science Procedure Manuals, DNA Section

    DFSS manuals covering mtDNA Sanger workflows, MPS deployment at CDFD and CFSLs, and admissibility under BSA 2023

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • Thompson JM, Ewing MM, Frank WE et al., Developmental validation of the PowerPlex Y23 System, Forensic Science International Genetics 2013

    Volume 7, Issue 2, pages 240-250, full validation study

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • Prinz M, Carracedo A, Mayr WR et al., DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG): recommendations regarding the role of forensic genetics for disaster victim identification (DVI), Forensic Science International Genetics 2007

    Volume 1, Issue 1, pages 3-12, ISFG DVI recommendations covering Y-STR and mtDNA role

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • Wilson MR, Polanskey D, Butler J, DiZinno JA, Replogle J, Budowle B, Extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing of mitochondrial DNA from human hair shafts, BioTechniques 1995

    Volume 18, pages 662-669, foundational study of hair-shaft mtDNA heteroplasmy

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • Andersen MM, Caliebe A, Jochens A, Willuweit S, Krawczak M, Estimating trace-suspect match probabilities for singleton Y-STR haplotypes using coalescent-theory-based methods, Forensic Science International Genetics 2013

    Volume 7, Issue 2, pages 264-271, plus YHRD documentation on the discrete laplace estimator

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • Kivisild T, Bamshad MJ, Kaldma K et al., Deep common ancestry of Indian and western-Eurasian mitochondrial DNA lineages, American Journal of Human Genetics 1999

    Volume 65, pages 1737-1751, foundational Indian mtDNA M and N phylogeography

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • Wilson MR, DiZinno JA, Polanskey D, Replogle J, Budowle B, Validation of mitochondrial DNA sequencing for forensic casework analysis, International Journal of Legal Medicine 1995

    Volume 108, pages 68-74, founding forensic mtDNA validation including hair-shaft samples

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • Jobling MA and Tyler-Smith C, The human Y chromosome: an evolutionary marker comes of age, Nature Reviews Genetics 2003

    Volume 4, pages 598-612, review of NRY structure and lineage marker theory

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • Metspalu M, Kivisild T, Metspalu E et al., Most of the extant mtDNA boundaries in South and Southwest Asia were likely shaped during the initial settlement of Eurasia by anatomically modern humans, BMC Genetics 2004

    Volume 5, Article 26, foundational Indian mtDNA structure study

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • Gill P, Ivanov PL, Kimpton C et al., Identification of the remains of the Romanov family by DNA analysis, Nature Genetics 1994

    Volume 6, pages 130-135, the foundational Romanov mtDNA paper

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • Stoneking M, Melton T, Nott J et al., Establishing the identity of Anna Anderson Manahan, Annals of Human Genetics 1995

    Volume 59, pages 1-9, plus Gill et al. 1994 Nature Genetics

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • Weissensteiner H, Pacher D, Kloss-Brandstaetter A et al., HaploGrep 2: mitochondrial haplogroup classification in the era of high-throughput sequencing, Nucleic Acids Research 2016

    Volume 44, W58-W63, the HaploGrep 2 paper plus van Oven and Kayser 2009 Phylotree

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • Butler JM, Advanced Topics in Forensic DNA Typing: Methodology, 1st edition

    Chapter 13, Y-chromosome short tandem repeats and chapter 14, Mitochondrial DNA analysis

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • Willuweit S and Roewer L, The new Y Chromosome Haplotype Reference Database, Forensic Science International Genetics 2015

    Volume 15, pages 43-48, with discussion of counting estimators and conservative upper confidence bounds

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • Ballantyne KN, Goedbloed M, Fang R et al., Mutability of Y-chromosomal microsatellites: rates, characteristics, molecular bases, and forensic implications, American Journal of Human Genetics 2010

    Volume 87, Issue 3, pages 341-353, foundational RM Y-STR panel and close-relative discrimination data

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • Kayser M, Roewer L, Hedman M et al., Characteristics and frequency of germline mutations at microsatellite loci from the human Y chromosome, American Journal of Human Genetics 2000

    Volume 66, pages 1580-1588, founding mutation-rate study used in forensic Y-STR interpretation

    Open source
    cited in 1 question
  • Cann RL, Stoneking M, Wilson AC, Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution, Nature 1987

    Volume 325, pages 31-36, foundational mitochondrial Eve paper

    Open source
    cited in 1 question

How our mocks are built

Questions are written and edited by the ForensicSpot team and cited from peer-reviewed forensic textbooks, official syllabi and primary case law. Each one is verified before publishing. Detailed explanations show after you submit, so the test stays a real test. See a mistake? Tell us.

Common questions

What does the Y-STR and Mitochondrial DNA: Lineage Analysis and Database Considerations (UGC-NET Unit III) mock cover?+

Advanced UGC-NET Forensic Science Unit III drill on lineage markers: Y-chromosome short tandem repeats (Y-STR) and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). Y-STR coverage spans Yfiler Plus 27-locus and PowerPlex Y23 multiplexes, paternal inheritance with no recombination on the non-recombining region of Y (NRY), male-specific typing in sexual-assault casework, haplotype frequency estimation via the Y-chromosome haplotype reference database (YHRD), the counting and discrete laplace methods, inability of standa

How many questions and how long is the test?+

30 multiple-choice questions, 30 minutes total. Difficulty: hard. Tier: Premium.

Who is this mock for?+

Forensic science students and aspirants who want timed, exam-style practice with explanations and verified source citations on NET. Useful for postgraduate entrance preparation and for BSc / MSc forensic students testing their recall under time.

Are the questions reviewed?+

Each question carries a verified source citation. Faculty review for individual questions is in progress.

Do I need an account to take this mock?+

Yes, a free ForensicSpot account is required to start a timed attempt — this lets you save progress, see per-question explanations after submission, and track your topic-level performance over time.

Your journey to becoming a forensic professional starts here.

Practice with mock tests, learn from structured notes, and get your questions answered by a global forensic community, all in one place.