Forensic Chemistry: Explosives, Fire Debris and Arson Analysis
Published:
Questions
30
Duration
30 min
Faculty-reviewed
30
Updated
03 May 2026
About this mock
This mock covers the chemistry, instrumentation and statutory framework of explosives, fire-debris and arson analysis as it appears in the FACT Forensic Chemistry II syllabus, the NFSU MSc Forensic Science papers, and the UGC-NET Forensic Science Paper II. Thirty medium-difficulty questions across the classification of explosives — low (deflagration < 1000 m/s) versus high (detonation > 1000 m/s with a true shock wave), primary versus secondary versus tertiary, military versus commercial — and the chemistry of the compounds an FSL meets in casework: TNT (2,4,6-trinitrotoluene), RDX (cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine), PETN (pentaerythritol tetranitrate), HMX, ANFO, nitroglycerine, picric acid and the peroxide-based improvised explosive TATP that has dominated 21st-century IED casework.
It then drills into pre-blast and post-blast detection: the modified Greiss test (the pink-red azo dye for nitrites and nitrated species after reduction), diphenylamine in concentrated sulphuric acid for nitrate / nitrite, ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) for trace airport screening, HPLC-UV, GC-MS in negative-ion chemical ionisation (NICI) for nitramines and nitrate esters at sub-nanogram levels, FTIR / ATR-FTIR and Raman for non-destructive bulk identification, ion chromatography for inorganic anions and cations from ammonium-nitrate and urea-nitrate residues, and SEM-EDX for particle-by-particle elemental confirmation of black-powder and flash-powder residues. The mock also covers fire-debris analysis under the ASTM E1412 (passive-headspace adsorption onto activated charcoal) and ASTM E1618 (GC-MS classification into Gasoline / LPD / MPD / HPD / iso-paraffinic / naphthenic-paraffinic / aromatic / n-alkane / oxygenated / miscellaneous) workflow, the diagnostic-ion (m/z 57, 91, 105, 117, 128, 142, 156) extracted-ion-chromatogram analysis that suppresses pyrolysis interferences from carpet, foam and wood, the fire tetrahedron, and the modern NFPA 921 consensus that visual char patterns alone are not reliable arson indicators.
It is pitched at first- and second-year MSc Forensic Science students at NFSU, LNJN-NICFS and other Indian universities, FACT and FACT Plus aspirants, and UGC-NET candidates.
Topics covered:
- Low vs high explosives — deflagration vs detonation, the 1000 m/s threshold
- Primary, secondary and tertiary sensitivity classes; the explosive train
- TNT, RDX, PETN, HMX, ANFO, nitroglycerine, picric acid, TATP — chemistry and analysis
- Pre-blast detection: Greiss, diphenylamine, IMS, HPLC, GC-MS NICI, FTIR, Raman
- Post-blast residue analysis: sampling, control samples, sub-microgram detection limits
- SEM-EDX for inorganic residues; ion chromatography for ammonium, nitrate, chlorate
- Fire chemistry: combustion, pyrolysis, the fire tetrahedron, the chain-reaction element
- ASTM E1618 ignitable-liquid classes (gasoline, LPD, MPD, HPD, etc.)
- Diagnostic-ion EIC analysis — m/z 57 alkanes, 91 aromatics, 117 indanes, 128/142/156 naphthalenes
- ASTM E1412 passive-headspace adsorption with activated charcoal; container choice (metal cans, Teflon-lined glass, nylon-11 Kapak)
- NFPA 921 origin-and-cause; the limits of visual char-pattern interpretation
- Indian statute: Explosives Act 1884 (regulatory, PESO licensing), Explosive Substances Act 1908 (criminal — Sections 3 / 4 / 5 / 6), BNS 2023 mischief-by-fire provisions
Each question carries a detailed 220+ word explanation citing the standard references — Saferstein's Criminalistics (12th edition), Beveridge's *Forensic Investigation of Explosions* (2nd edition, CRC Press 2012), Yinon's *Forensic and Environmental Detection of Explosives* (Wiley 1999), Stauffer, Dolan and Newman's *Fire Debris Analysis* (Academic Press 2008), ASTM E1412 and ASTM E1618, ASTM E1492 on evidence handling, NFPA 921 (current edition), the Explosives Act 1884 with the Explosives Rules 2008, and the Explosive Substances Act 1908. Allow 30 minutes; the explanations are long enough to use as study notes by themselves. If you can pass this mock comfortably, you have the FACT Forensic Chemistry II explosives-and-arson layer that the case-law and instrumental-techniques papers build on.
Sources & references
Questions in this mock are written and verified against the following sources. Citations are recorded per question and shown in the explanation after submission.
- cited in 13 questions
Beveridge, A. (ed.) — Forensic Investigation of Explosions
2nd Edition (CRC Press 2012), Chapter on SEM-EDX of Inorganic Post-Blast Residues
- cited in 6 questions
Yinon, J. (ed.) — Forensic and Environmental Detection of Explosives
Wiley 1999, Chapter on Mass Spectrometry of Explosives (NICI for nitramines)
- cited in 3 questions
NFPA 921 — Guide for Fire and Explosion Investigations
Chapter on Fire Patterns (the limitations of visual char-pattern interpretation)
- cited in 2 questions
ASTM E1618 — Standard Test Method for Ignitable Liquid Residues in Extracts from Fire Debris Samples by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry
Section on classification of ignitable liquids (gasoline, LPD/MPD/HPD, etc.)
- cited in 1 question
Explosive Substances Act, 1908 (Act No. 6 of 1908)
Sections 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 (offences and required sanction)
- cited in 1 question
Saferstein, Richard — Criminalistics: An Introduction to Forensic Science
12th Edition, Chapter on Arson and Explosion Investigations (low vs high explosives)
- cited in 1 question
Explosives Act, 1884 (Act No. 4 of 1884) and the Explosives Rules, 2008
Read with the Petroleum and Explosives Safety Organisation (PESO) website and notifications
- cited in 1 question
ASTM E1412 — Standard Practice for the Separation of Ignitable Liquid Residues from Fire Debris Samples by Passive Headspace Concentration with Activated Charcoal
Read with ASTM E1618 (GC-MS analysis)
- cited in 1 question
Stauffer, E., Dolan, J.A. and Newman, R. — Fire Debris Analysis
Academic Press 2008, Chapter on GC-MS Analysis of Ignitable-Liquid Residues (TIC vs EIC)
- cited in 1 question
ASTM E1492 — Standard Practice for Receiving, Documenting, Storing, and Retrieving Evidence in a Forensic Science Laboratory
Read with ASTM E1412 on container requirements for fire-debris evidence
How our mocks are built
Questions are written and edited by the ForensicSpot team and cited from peer-reviewed forensic textbooks, official syllabi and primary case law. Each one is verified before publishing. Detailed explanations show after you submit, so the test stays a real test. See a mistake? Tell us.
Common questions
What does the Forensic Chemistry: Explosives, Fire Debris and Arson Analysis mock cover?+
This mock covers the chemistry, instrumentation and statutory framework of explosives, fire-debris and arson analysis as it appears in the FACT Forensic Chemistry II syllabus, the NFSU MSc Forensic Science papers, and the UGC-NET Forensic Science Paper II. Thirty medium-difficulty questions across the classification of explosives — low (deflagration < 1000 m/s) versus high (detonation > 1000 m/s with a true shock wave), primary versus secondary versus tertiary, military versus commercial — and t
How many questions and how long is the test?+
30 multiple-choice questions, 30 minutes total. Difficulty: medium. Tier: Premium.
Who is this mock for?+
Forensic science students and aspirants who want timed, exam-style practice with explanations and verified source citations on Forensic Chemistry, FACT, NET. Useful for postgraduate entrance preparation and for BSc / MSc forensic students testing their recall under time.
Are the questions reviewed?+
Yes — 30 of 30 questions are faculty-reviewed. Each question carries a verified source citation.
Do I need an account to take this mock?+
Yes, a free ForensicSpot account is required to start a timed attempt — this lets you save progress, see per-question explanations after submission, and track your topic-level performance over time.